Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to pachterlab/paperpush. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pachterlab/paperpush/main/.claude/skills/paperpush-autofill/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pachterlab/paperpushWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pachterlab/paperpush/paperpush-autofill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pachterlab/paperpush/paperpush-autofill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pachterlab/paperpush/paperpush-autofill.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00098 | $0.02427 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00049 | $0.01213 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00485 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00243 |
Grade A, and why
paperpush-autofill scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 194 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
paperpush autofill (Claude skill)
Populate a <venue>.sub file from a directory of manuscript files. You read
the files and decide the values; the paperpush autofill command does all
the writing, gating, and validation, so you cannot accidentally overwrite a
policy field or produce an invalid file. Your job is extraction, not writing.
First: make sure you have a directory
The manuscript directory is required. If the skill was invoked on its own, without a directory in the user's message, stop and ask the user to provide the path to their manuscript directory before doing anything else — do not guess, do not scan the repository for candidate folders, and do not fall back to test fixtures. A good prompt is:
Which directory holds your manuscript files? Tell me the path, and (if you can) which file is the manuscript, which is the title page with authors and affiliations, where the figures are, and any supplements.
Only once the user has given you a directory should you continue. If they also named the venue, use it; otherwise infer or ask per the inputs below.
Inputs you need
- The venue slug (e.g.
biorxiv). If the user did not say, ask, or infer it from a<slug>.subfilename they mention. Confirm it is supported withpaperpush --venues. - The manuscript directory and what each file is. Ask the user to
describe the directory if they have not, for example:
"
manuscript.pdfis the paper,title_page.pdfhas the authors and affiliations, figures are infigures/,supplement.pdfis supplementary material." If they just give a folder, list it and propose a mapping from the filenames, then confirm before extracting. Author names, emails, affiliations, and ORCIDs come out far more reliably from a title page or LaTeX/Word source than from a flattened PDF, so prefer those when present.
Steps
-
Get the field schema and roles (the source of truth for what to fill):
paperpush schema <venue>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 194 lines · 98 tokens per session scan A bfc39d48711c
paperpush-autofill is a skill published in the GitHub repository pachterlab/paperpush (163 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed BSD-2-Clause. It adds 98 tokens to every session and 2,427 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pydicom
Use pydicom to read, inspect, write, transform, and safely preflight local DICOM datasets and pixel data. Applies to DICOM metadata, transfer syntaxes, compression plugins, frames, private elements, JSON, and bounded de-identification review.
pptx-posters
Create and audit editable scientific posters in macro-free PowerPoint (.pptx) from author-approved local content and assets. Use when the requested deliverable is a PowerPoint research/conference poster and exact physical, printer, accessibility, provenance, and package-security checks are required.
extracting-lab-tables
Detects and extracts tabular laboratory panels from PDFs, scans, and images into structured rows ready for OpenMed and FHIR. Use when the user has a CBC, CMP, lipid panel, or other lab report as a scanned image / PDF / spreadsheet and needs the test name, value, unit, reference range, and abnormal flag as clean rows.…
paper-spine
Build, rewrite, audit, submit, revise, or transfer scholarly papers end to end, producing verified LaTeX/PDF/Word and target-specific publication packages.
paper-compile
A build workflow that turns LaTeX source files into a PDF and checks whether the paper compiles correctly. LaTeX is a text-based system commonly used for academic papers.
nsfc-budget
A tool that creates an editable LaTeX budget justification and renders it as a PDF for an NSFC research-funding application. NSFC is China’s National Natural Science Foundation, and a budget justification explains why proposed costs are needed.