Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pan94u/forge --skill security-practicesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pan94u/forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pan94u/forge/security-practices)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pan94u/forge/security-practices"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pan94u/forge/security-practices/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pan94u/forge/security-practices"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pan94u/forge/security-practices.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00590 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00236 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00118 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
security-practices scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 77 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A e4fb44ce1134
security-practices is a skill published in the GitHub repository pan94u/forge (40 stars, last pushed 16d ago), with no licence file. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 590 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
API Security Testing
Comprehensive API security testing based on OWASP API Security Top 10 including broken authentication, injection attacks, rate limiting, BOLA/BFLA vulnerabilities, and automated security scanning with ZAP and custom scripts.
security-hardening
Use when writing code that handles user input, auth, sessions, or external data. Covers OWASP prevention patterns. Do NOT use for general code quality or performance — see dedicated skills.
security-review
Security Code Review: Reviews code for security vulnerabilities including authentication (OAuth2, JWT), authorization (RBAC, roles), API security, data protection, payment security, and common attack vectors. Use whenever the user wants a security review, penetration test analysis, threat model, or mentions OAuth2…
api-security-best-practices
API security checklist and best practices.
security-practices
OWASP Top 10, authentication, and secure coding practices.
exploiting-broken-function-level-authorization
Tests APIs for Broken Function Level Authorization (BFLA) vulnerabilities where regular users can invoke administrative functions or access privileged API endpoints by directly calling them. The tester identifies admin and privileged endpoints, then attempts to access them with regular user credentials by manipulating…