Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skills --skill automotive-safetygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skills/automotive-safety)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skills/automotive-safety"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skills/automotive-safety/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skills/automotive-safety"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skills/automotive-safety.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.38861 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.19431 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.07772 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.03886 |
Grade A, and why
automotive-safety scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
compile_result = subprocess.run(['make', 'clean', 'all'], How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 5,176 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Automotive Safety
Fmea Fta Analysis
FMEA/FTA/FMEDA Analysis for ISO 26262
Comprehensive guidance on Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), and Failure Modes, Effects, and Diagnostic Analysis (FMEDA) for automotive functional safety, including templates, calculation methods, and production-ready examples.
Overview
Analysis Types
FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis)
- Bottom-up analysis: component failure → system effect
- Identifies single-point and latent faults
- Calculates diagnostic coverage
- Required for all ASIL levels
FTA (Fault Tree Analysis)
- Top-down analysis: hazardous event → contributing faults
- Quantifies failure probability
- Validates ASIL decomposition
- Mandatory for ASIL C/D
FMEDA (Failure Modes, Effects, and Diagnostic Analysis)
- Extension of FMEA with quantitative metrics
- Calculates PMHF (Probabilistic Metric for random Hardware Failures)
- Determines SPFM and LFM
- Required for ASIL B/C/D hardware
FMEA Methodology
FMEA Process Flow
┌──────────────────────────┐
│ 1. Define System │
│ Boundaries │
└────────┬─────────────────┘
│
▼
┌──────────────────────────┐
│ 2. Identify Components │
│ and Functions │
└────────┬─────────────────┘
│
▼
┌──────────────────────────┐
│ 3. Identify Failure │
│ Modes │
└────────┬─────────────────┘
│
▼
┌──────────────────────────┐
│ 4. Analyze Effects │
│ (Local/System/End) │
└────────┬─────────────────┘
│
▼
┌──────────────────────────┐
│ 5. Classify Faults │
│ (SPF/RF/LF) │
└────────┬─────────────────┘
│
▼
┌──────────────────────────┐
│ 6. Define Safety │
│ Mechanisms │
└────────┬─────────────────┘
│
▼
┌──────────────────────────┐
│ 7. Calculate Diagnostic │
│ Coverage (DC) │
└────────┬─────────────────┘
│
▼
┌──────────────────────────┐
│ 8. Verify Metrics │
│ (SPFM/LFM/PMHF) │
└──────────────────────────┘
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 5,176 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 6f44f397c9c5
automotive-safety is a skill published in the GitHub repository pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skills (5 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 38,861 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
iso26262
ISO 26262 functional-safety expert that operates in two modes: (1) HARA / ASIL determination — enumerate hazardous events from item malfunctions × driving situations, rate Severity (S0–S3), Exposure (E0–E4), Controllability (C0–C3), look up ASIL from ISO 26262-3:2018 Table 4, and produce a HARA report with Safety…
automotive-syseng
When the user wants to analyze automotive requirements, check INCOSE/EARS compliance, review MISRA-C code, assess ADAS levels, or verify ISO 26262/AUTOSAR/SOTIF conformance. Also use when the user says 'check requirements', 'EARS check', 'INCOSE analysis', 'MISRA check', 'ASIL assessment', 'V-model check'…
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
train-pose
Train/evaluate WiFi pose models honestly — camera-supervised (MediaPipe + CSI) and camera-free (WiFlow), always checked against the mean-pose baseline before any PCK is quoted.
experiment-audit
A review step that checks whether an experiment's reported results are supported by real data and a sufficiently broad test.
i4h-catheter-navigation-e2e
End-to-end smoke for catheter navigation covering setup, digital twin, DRR, and unit tests. Use when asked to run the full catheter workflow smoke or demo the v0.7 pipeline.