Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skills --skill automotive-sotif-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skills/automotive-sotif-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skills/automotive-sotif-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skills/automotive-sotif-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skills/automotive-sotif-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skills/automotive-sotif-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.02211 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.01105 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00442 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00221 |
Grade A, and why
automotive-sotif-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 263 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Automotive Sotif Audit
Sotif Audit
SOTIF Audit & Assessment — Process Maturity and Compliance Evaluation
Overview
Systematic audit and assessment framework for evaluating SOTIF (ISO 21448) implementation maturity across the product development lifecycle. Provides audit checklists, maturity models, and gap assessment tools for ADAS/ADS projects.
SOTIF Maturity Model
SOTIF实施成熟度模型（5级）
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Level 1: Initial (初始级)
├── 无系统性SOTIF流程
├── 依赖个人经验识别风险
├── 测试以功能验证为主
└── 无SOTIF专项文档
Level 2: Managed (管理级)
├── 基本SOTIF分析流程建立
├── 触发条件清单初步建立
├── 部分场景覆盖仿真
├── SOTIF角色分配
└── 基础文档体系
Level 3: Defined (定义级)
├── 完整SOTIF流程贯穿V模型
├── 系统化触发条件识别方法
├── 场景库建立（>500场景）
├── 量化覆盖度指标
├── 跨部门协作机制
└── 与功能安全/网络安全集成
Level 4: Quantitatively Managed (量化管理级)
├── 基于数据的残余风险量化
├── 自然驾驶数据驱动场景扩展
├── 持续监控与闭环反馈
├── 仿真-实车-运营数据链路
└── 预测性风险评估
Level 5: Optimizing (优化级)
├── AI辅助场景发现
├── 持续学习与自适应安全
├── 行业基准对标
├── 前瞻性标准影响
└── 跨OEM经验共享
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Audit Checklist
Phase 1: Specification & Design (ISO 21448 Clause 5-7)
## SOTIF Specification & Design Audit
### 5. Functional and System Specification
- [ ] System functions clearly defined with intended behavior
- [ ] ODD boundaries explicitly specified
- [ ] Performance limitations documented per sensor/algorithm
- [ ] Known functional insufficiencies identified
- [ ] System architecture supports SOTIF analysis
### 6. Identification of Triggering Conditions & Hazardous Behaviors
- [ ] Systematic method for triggering condition identification (STPA/HAZOP/brainstorming)
- [ ] Triggering conditions categorized by source (sensor/algorithm/human/infrastructure)
- [ ] Functional insufficiency chain analysis (TC → FI → HB → Harm)
- [ ] Severity/Exposure/Controllability assessment per hazardous behavior
- [ ] Coverage of China-specific triggering conditions (if applicable)
- [ ] Triggering condition catalog maintained and version-controlled
### 7. Evaluation of Known Hazardous Scenarios
- [ ] Hazardous scenario catalog established
- [ ] Risk assessment performed (S/E/C or similar)
- [ ] Acceptance criteria defined for residual risk
- [ ] Scenarios prioritized for V&V
- [ ] Traceability from TC to test cases
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 263 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 9d8cf10068c1
automotive-sotif-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skills (5 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 2,211 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
iso26262
ISO 26262 functional-safety expert that operates in two modes: (1) HARA / ASIL determination — enumerate hazardous events from item malfunctions × driving situations, rate Severity (S0–S3), Exposure (E0–E4), Controllability (C0–C3), look up ASIL from ISO 26262-3:2018 Table 4, and produce a HARA report with Safety…
automotive-syseng
When the user wants to analyze automotive requirements, check INCOSE/EARS compliance, review MISRA-C code, assess ADAS levels, or verify ISO 26262/AUTOSAR/SOTIF conformance. Also use when the user says 'check requirements', 'EARS check', 'INCOSE analysis', 'MISRA check', 'ASIL assessment', 'V-model check'…
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
train-pose
Train/evaluate WiFi pose models honestly — camera-supervised (MediaPipe + CSI) and camera-free (WiFlow), always checked against the mean-pose baseline before any PCK is quoted.
experiment-audit
A review step that checks whether an experiment's reported results are supported by real data and a sufficiently broad test.
i4h-catheter-navigation-e2e
End-to-end smoke for catheter navigation covering setup, digital twin, DRR, and unit tests. Use when asked to run the full catheter workflow smoke or demo the v0.7 pipeline.