Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pantheon-org/tekhnenpx agentmods add skills/pantheon-org/tekhne/bdd-testingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pantheon-org/tekhne/bdd-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pantheon-org/tekhne/bdd-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pantheon-org/tekhne/bdd-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pantheon-org/tekhne/bdd-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pantheon-org/tekhne/bdd-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 6 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 31 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 40 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 48 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 56 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 64 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 74 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.00979 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00490 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00196 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00098 |
Grade A, and why
bdd-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 152 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
BDD Testing
When to Use
Use this skill when behavior needs to be specified and validated in shared, business-readable scenarios.
When Not to Use
Do not use BDD feature files for low-level unit behavior that is internal and not stakeholder-facing.
Core Principles
- Specify observable behavior, not implementation details.
- Keep a shared language across product, engineering, and QA.
- Scenarios should be deterministic and independently executable.
- Feature files should remain readable by non-developers.
Deterministic Workflow
- Align on examples in a Three Amigos discussion.
- Write scenarios in Gherkin using Given/When/Then.
- Implement step definitions that map to business language.
- Execute Cucumber and review failures by scenario intent.
- Validation checkpoint: If scenarios fail due to incorrect business logic, loop back to step 2 to clarify requirements.
- Validation checkpoint: If scenarios fail due to step definition errors or missing steps, loop back to step 3 to fix implementation.
- Error recovery: Run
npx cucumber-js --dry-runto identify missing step definitions before full execution. - Error recovery: For async timing issues, verify step definitions properly await promises.
- Refactor scenarios and steps to remove duplication.
Quick Commands
Run all feature tests
npx cucumber-js features
Expected result: scenario pass/fail summary and non-zero exit on failures.
Dry-run to detect missing step definitions
npx cucumber-js --dry-run features
Expected result: undefined steps listed without full execution.
Run a tagged subset
npx cucumber-js --tags "@smoke and not @wip"
Expected result: only matching scenarios execute.
Generate JSON report
npx cucumber-js --format json:reports/cucumber-report.json
Expected result: machine-readable execution report for CI/reporting.
Troubleshoot common Cucumber failures
Step definition mismatch:
What ships with it
30 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- .audits/2026-02-21/analysis.md 8.0 KB
- .audits/2026-02-21/audit.json 135 B
- .audits/2026-02-21/remediation-plan.md 218 B
- .audits/2026-02-22/analysis.md 8.0 KB
- .audits/2026-02-22/audit.json 135 B
- .audits/2026-02-22/remediation-plan.md 218 B
- .audits/2026-02-23/analysis.md 8.0 KB
- .audits/2026-02-23/audit.json 138 B
- .audits/2026-02-23/remediation-plan.md 214 B
- .audits/2026-03-02/analysis.md 1.0 KB
- .audits/2026-03-02/audit.json 410 B
- .audits/2026-03-02/remediation-plan.md 2.0 KB
- .audits/latest 10 B
- .tessl-plugin/plugin.json 508 B
- AGENTS.md 4.8 KB
- evals/scenario-01.md 4.2 KB
- evals/scenario-02.md 3.9 KB
- evals/scenario-03.md 4.2 KB
- evals/scenario-04.md 3.2 KB
- evals/scenario-05.md 4.1 KB
- evals/scenario-06.md 4.2 KB
- evals/scenario-07.md 4.7 KB
- evals/scenario-08.md 4.5 KB
- references/cucumber-setup.md 1.5 KB
- references/gherkin-syntax.md 3.1 KB
- references/principles-core-philosophy.md 2.6 KB
- references/principles-example-mapping.md 12 KB
- references/principles-living-documentation.md 8.6 KB
- references/principles-three-amigos.md 2.3 KB
- references/principles-ubiquitous-language.md 11 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 152 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 5cbbea37253a
bdd-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository pantheon-org/tekhne (10 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 979 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-driven-development
Drives development with tests using the red-green-refactor loop. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Use when you need to prove that code works, when a bug report arrives, or when you're about to modify existing functionality.
skillshare-implement-feature
Implement a feature from a spec file or description using TDD workflow. Use this skill whenever the user asks to: add a new CLI command, implement a feature from a spec, build new functionality, add a flag, create a new internal package, or write Go code for skillshare. This skill enforces test-first development…
create-custom-grader
Use when converting an existing benchmark, rubric, verifier, task YAML/JSON, or domain check into SkillEvaluator BYOG/BYOT custom evaluation.
story-origin-check
Recover the first public timestamp and canonical major coverage for a newsjacking signal, then decide whether newer coverage is the same story, a different story, or a materially new development.
prompt-proximity-architecture
Turn an approved measurement charter, ICPs, and buyer jobs into a budget-aware prompt coverage blueprint across proximity bands, aided status, information acts, journey states, roles, locales, evidence grades, partitions, and measurement lanes. Use before prompt wording to define required, optional, and prohibited…
xdto-validate
A validator for XDTO packages in 1C:Enterprise. It checks the package model, its metadata object, and its connection to the configuration.