challenge

challenge is a skill for Claude Code from pantheon-org/tekhne. It costs 91 tokens per session (1,684 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A structured challenge tool for testing AI output by looking for weak assumptions, factual errors, framing problems, and other flaws.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to ask for a second opinion, verify claims, challenge a decision, or stress-test an answer.
Why use it?
It helps expose mistakes or premature conclusions before they are accepted as reliable.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions subagents; names the AskUserQuestion tool.

Good fit Use it to ask for a second opinion, verify claims, challenge a decision, or stress-test an answer.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/pantheon-org/tekhne/challenge
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add pantheon-org/tekhne --skill challenge
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pantheon-org/tekhne

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for challenge

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pantheon-org/tekhne/challenge/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pantheon-org/tekhne/challenge)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pantheon-org/tekhne/challenge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pantheon-org/tekhne/challenge/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for challenge

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pantheon-org/tekhne/challenge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pantheon-org/tekhne/challenge.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 91 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,684 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Excessive Agency · line 5
    Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.
    Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00091 $0.01684
Opus 5 $0.00046 $0.00842
Sonnet 5 $0.00018 $0.00337
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00168

Measured 9d ago against content hash 4e249b9c5763, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

challenge scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/software-engineering/challenge/SKILL.md · 127 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 127 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Challenge

Apply structured provocation patterns to force reconsideration of current work.

Target: $ARGUMENTS

⚠️ AskUserQuestion Guard

CRITICAL: After EVERY AskUserQuestion call, check if answers are empty/blank. Known Claude Code bug: outside Plan Mode, AskUserQuestion silently returns empty answers without showing UI.

If answers are empty: DO NOT proceed with assumptions. Instead:

  1. Output: "⚠️ Questions didn't display (known Claude Code bug outside Plan Mode)."
  2. Present the options as a numbered text list and ask user to reply with their choice number.
  3. WAIT for user reply before continuing.

Dispatch

Parse first word of $ARGUMENTS as subcommand:

Subcommand Error Type Protocol
anchor Premature commitment / anchoring bias Read references/protocols/anchor.md → execute
verify Factual errors / hallucination Read references/protocols/verify.md → execute
framing Wrong problem / framing errors Read references/protocols/framing.md → execute
deep High stakes — all 9 patterns in fresh context Spawn devil-advocate sub-agent via Agent

No-Subcommand Fallback

If no subcommand detected:

AskUserQuestion: "What are you worried about with the current AI response?"

  • A) Anchoring bias — AI committed too early to one approach
  • B) Factual accuracy — claims may be wrong or hallucinated
  • C) Wrong framing — solving the wrong problem
  • D) High stakes — want all 9 patterns in fresh context (Devil's Advocate)

→ Dispatch to matching subcommand based on answer.

Deep Subcommand

Spawn via Agent tool a devil's advocate sub-agent with:

  • prompt: target description + relevant file paths to read
  • The agent runs ALL 9 patterns (anchor: Gatekeeper, Reset, Alt Approaches, Pre-mortem · verify: Proof Demand, CoVe, Fact Check List · framing: Socratic, Steelman) comprehensively in fresh context
  • DO NOT pass parent conversation reasoning — fresh context is the point

Thinking Transparency (applies to all subcommands)

Read the full file on GitHub · 127 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 127 lines · 91 tokens per session scan A 4e249b9c5763

Subscribe to this mod's changes

challenge is a skill published in the GitHub repository pantheon-org/tekhne (10 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 91 tokens to every session and 1,684 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

gke-ai-troubleshooting-jobset-interruption

Diagnoses GKE JobSet interruptions, restarts, and preemptions for AI/ML training workloads autonomously. Use when troubleshooting JobSet restart loops, spot VM preemptions, node readiness failures, host VM issues, or coordinator worker crashes. Don't use for general GKE cluster creation, basic workload deployment, or…

google/skills · 83 tokens

gke-node-notready

Diagnoses GKE nodes reporting NotReady or Unknown status by inspecting node conditions, events, kubelet/containerd logs, and node metrics, then proposing safe remediations. Use when nodes show NotReady, when the kubelet stops posting node status, or when workloads are evicted or stuck Pending due to node health. Don't…

google/skills · 112 tokens

gke-ai-troubleshooting-tpu-vbar-oom

Diagnoses and prevents vbarcontrolagent segfaults, out-of-memory (OOM) errors, and TPU device initialization failures on TPU v6e nodes in GKE caused by race conditions during TPU device resets or high-frequency metrics polling. Use when troubleshooting vbarcontrolagent crashes, memory cgroup OOMs in serial console…

google/skills · 125 tokens

systematic-debugging

A step-by-step method for finding the underlying cause of technical problems before changing code. It covers reading errors, reproducing failures, checking recent changes, and tracing data across system components.

jnMetaCode/superpowers-zh · 24 tokens

comet-hotfix

A quick workflow for fixing an existing bug in Comet, a tool that manages structured code changes. It moves through opening the change, building, checking, and archiving it.

rpamis/comet · 29 tokens

comet-hotfix

Comet preset path: Bug fix / hotfix. Skip brainstorming, directly open → build → verify → archive. Applicable for behavior fixes, scenarios not involving new capability design.

rpamis/comet · 40 tokens