Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add papadopouloskyriakos/agentic-chatops --skill cross-tier-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/papadopouloskyriakos/agentic-chatopsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/papadopouloskyriakos/agentic-chatops/cross-tier-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/papadopouloskyriakos/agentic-chatops/cross-tier-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/papadopouloskyriakos/agentic-chatops/cross-tier-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/papadopouloskyriakos/agentic-chatops/cross-tier-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/papadopouloskyriakos/agentic-chatops/cross-tier-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00653 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00327 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00131 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
cross-tier-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 58 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A a33661a2e1b1
cross-tier-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository papadopouloskyriakos/agentic-chatops (108 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 653 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-code-analyzer
Agent skill for code-analyzer - invoke with $agent-code-analyzer.
pr-review-triage
Watch open PRs, check CI status, review staleness, merge conflicts, and unanswered review comments. Produces a prioritized watchlist.
learn-from-sage
Detection-gap (miss) analysis for Code Review Sage. Learn from shipped fixes, acted-on human comments, and design outcomes to close reviewer blind spots. Inline during review stages a candidate; a human triggers a one-shot AI consolidation into the live ruleset.
github-review-pr
Review GitHub pull requests with detailed, multi-perspective code analysis using parallel subagents. Use this skill whenever the user wants to review a PR, asks for code review on a pull request, mentions "review PR", "check this PR", "look at pull request", or references a PR number or GitHub PR URL. Do NOT use for…
nw-review-workflow
Detailed review process, v2 validation checklist, and scoring methodology for agent definition reviews.
plan-implementation
Disciplined execution of approved plans with step-by-step verification, phase checkpoints, failure investigation, and mandatory code/security reviews.