Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/paperclipai/paperclip/create-issue-interaction-uinpx skills add paperclipai/paperclip --skill create-issue-interaction-uigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclipWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00044 | $0.03080 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.01540 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00616 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00308 |
Grade A, and why
create-issue-interaction-ui scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 276 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create a new issue-thread interaction UI (Developer/maintainer skill)
Developer/maintainer skill. Do NOT install this on production Paperclip agents.
This skill walks a Paperclip contributor through introducing a new issue-thread
interaction kind from shared contract to issue-detail wiring, helpers, and
docs. It is intentionally a developer/maintainer skill: the audience is a
human or coding agent making code changes inside paperclipai/paperclip, not
the operational agents that run inside a deployed Paperclip company.
Do NOT install this on production Paperclip agents. This guide is for repository contributors changing Paperclip itself.
When to use
- A new interaction kind is being introduced (compact picker, structured rating, in-thread approval card, etc.).
- An existing interaction needs a parallel variant with a distinct payload
shape, validation, or resolution outcome (and
ask_user_questionsis the wrong fit because option count, target binding, or result shape differs). - A reviewer asks for "the same audit, staleness, supersede, and continuation semantics as the other interactions" on a new card.
When NOT to use
- Adding fields to an existing interaction kind that does not need a new payload schema. Patch the existing validators/UI in place instead.
- Changing how Paperclip agents call interactions. Update
skills/papercliporreferences/api-reference.md; that is agent guidance, not card work. - Building a non-thread UI (issue detail sidebar, project board widget, etc.). Those have their own component conventions.
Mental model
Every issue-thread interaction has four moving parts:
| Layer | Owns |
|---|---|
| Shared | Kind constant, payload/result interfaces, Zod validators, exported types, shared-test coverage. |
| Server | Service create/accept/reject/respond, staleness, supersede, idempotency, activity log, wake send. |
| UI | Card pending/resolved/stale states, fixtures, Storybook, issue-thread/IssueDetail wiring. |
| Helpers/Docs | CLI command, MCP tool, plugin SDK type+host+testing path, skills/paperclip guidance. |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 276 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 721819ad168f
create-issue-interaction-ui is a skill published in the GitHub repository paperclipai/paperclip (79,688 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 3,080 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…
imagegen
Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…