Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add param087/agent-ml-skills --skill rag-pipelinegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/param087/agent-ml-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/param087/agent-ml-skills/rag-pipeline)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/param087/agent-ml-skills/rag-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/param087/agent-ml-skills/rag-pipeline/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/param087/agent-ml-skills/rag-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/param087/agent-ml-skills/rag-pipeline.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00730 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00292 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00146 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
rag-pipeline scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
RAG Pipeline
Overview
RAG grounds an LLM in your data by retrieving relevant context at query time. Most RAG quality problems are retrieval problems, not generation problems — if the right chunk isn't retrieved, no prompt can save the answer. Optimize retrieval first.
When to use
- The model must answer over private/large/changing documents.
- You need citations and reduced hallucination.
- Fine-tuning is overkill or data changes too often.
Pipeline stages
- Ingest & chunk documents.
- Embed chunks → vector store.
- Retrieve (dense + sparse) for a query.
- Rerank top candidates.
- Assemble prompt with context + citations.
- Generate and evaluate.
Chunking
- Start at ~500-1000 tokens with ~10-15% overlap.
- Prefer semantic/structural boundaries (headings, paragraphs) over fixed char counts.
- Keep metadata (source, title, section, URL) on every chunk for citations and filtering.
Embeddings & store
- Choose an embedding model by your domain + the MTEB leaderboard; match it at query and index time.
- Normalize vectors; use cosine similarity.
- Vector stores: pgvector (already have Postgres), Qdrant/Weaviate/Milvos (scale), FAISS (local/offline).
Hybrid retrieval + reranking (the biggest quality lever)
# 1. Dense (semantic) + 2. Sparse (BM25 keyword) -> union
dense_hits = vstore.search(embed(query), k=20)
sparse_hits = bm25.search(query, k=20)
candidates = dedupe(dense_hits + sparse_hits)
# 3. Cross-encoder rerank for precision
from sentence_transformers import CrossEncoder
reranker = CrossEncoder("cross-encoder/ms-marco-MiniLM-L-6-v2")
ranked = sorted(candidates,
key=lambda c: reranker.predict([(query, c.text)]),
reverse=True)[:5]
Prompt assembly
- Insert only the top-k reranked chunks; respect the context window.
- Instruct: "Answer only from the context; if it's not there, say you don't know."
- Require inline citations to chunk metadata so answers are auditable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 78 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 13a9ed60dd43
rag-pipeline is a skill published in the GitHub repository param087/agent-ml-skills (13 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 730 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
rag-pipeline compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rag-pipelineparam087/agent-ml-skills | Skill | 13 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 40 | Claude Code, Codex |
| 9router-embeddingsdecolua/9router | Skill | 32k | 9d ago | MIT | A | 66 | Claude Code, Codex |
| mongodb-search-and-aifcakyon/claude-codex-settings | Skill | 1.2k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 210 | Claude Code |
| llm-application-devMoizIbnYousaf/Ai-Agent-Skills | Skill | 1.2k | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 40 | Claude Code, Codex |
| qdrant-model-migrationqdrant/skills | Skill | 267 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 88 | Claude Code |
| qdrant-multitenancyqdrant/skills | Skill | 267 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 109 | Claude Code |
| qdrant-search-speed-optimizationqdrant/skills | Skill | 267 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 78 | Claude Code |