Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Parcha-ai/parcha-skills --skill desloppifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Parcha-ai/parcha-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/parcha-ai/parcha-skills/desloppify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/parcha-ai/parcha-skills/desloppify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/parcha-ai/parcha-skills/desloppify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/parcha-ai/parcha-skills/desloppify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/parcha-ai/parcha-skills/desloppify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00104 | $0.01344 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00052 | $0.00672 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00269 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
desloppify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 135 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Desloppify
Turn a codebase health inventory into evidence-backed cleanup. Preserve product behavior first; improve the strict score by making the code genuinely easier to change, never by gaming exclusions or suppressions.
This portable companion uses the official Desloppify engine created by Peter O'Malley. The engine is a separate OSNL-0.2 dependency; this skill does not bundle it.
Work the loop
1. Scope one coherent program
Read the repository instructions and inspect the tree, language manifests, generated directories, vendor code, build output, and nested worktrees.
- Scan one coherent program at a time. In a monorepo, use separate
--pathtargets for independently built frontend, backend, service, or package roots. - Exclude obvious generated/vendor/build content. Ask before excluding an ambiguous authored directory because exclusion removes it from the score.
- Add
.desloppify/to the applicable.gitignorebefore scanning. It contains local, source-derived state and review packets; never commit or package it.
2. Pin behavior before quality work
Record current HEAD, dirty files, and the existing project gate: tests, lint, types, builds, or smoke checks appropriate to the repository. Run the cheapest representative slice before editing and preserve its result as the baseline.
If the baseline is already failing, separate pre-existing failures from new ones. A higher Desloppify score never excuses a product regression.
3. Establish the health baseline
Resolve the bundled script relative to this SKILL.md, then run its local,
credential-blind doctor:
python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/desloppify_portable.py doctor --project <coherent-project-root>
It performs no network request, install, model invocation, or shared-file write. Fix its actionable failures, then run the official engine through the argv-safe adapter:
python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/desloppify_portable.py run -- --version
python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/desloppify_portable.py run -- scan --path <coherent-project-root>
python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/desloppify_portable.py run -- status
python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/desloppify_portable.py run -- next
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 135 lines · 104 tokens per session scan A 4a8abe7e5890
desloppify is a skill published in the GitHub repository Parcha-ai/parcha-skills (59 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 104 tokens to every session and 1,344 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…