Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add patriceckhart/zot --skill write-zot-extensiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/patriceckhart/zotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/patriceckhart/zot/write-zot-extension)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/patriceckhart/zot/write-zot-extension"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/patriceckhart/zot/write-zot-extension/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/patriceckhart/zot/write-zot-extension"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/patriceckhart/zot/write-zot-extension.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 140 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- high Tool Misuse · line 140 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 292 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.03542 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.01771 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00708 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00354 |
Grade C, and why
write-zot-extension scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletehighDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
"tool_name":"bash","tool_args":{"command":"rm -rf /tmp/foo"}} How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 384 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Writing a zot extension
Use this skill when the user asks for help building a zot extension — a new slash command, a new tool the LLM can call, an audit hook, or a permission gate. Skim this whole skill first, then collaborate with the user on the specific extension they want.
What an extension is
A zot extension is an external executable that zot launches as a subprocess and talks to over its stdin/stdout in newline-delimited JSON. It can be written in any language that can read/write JSON lines from stdio: Go, TypeScript (via tsx), Python, Rust, shell with jq, anything. Crash isolation is automatic; one bad extension never takes down zot.
Three things an extension can do (any combination):
-
Slash commands — register
/fooso the user can run it from the input. The handler returns a "prompt" (submitted to the agent), an "insert" (text dropped into the editor), a "display" (one-shot styled note in the chat), or a "noop". -
Tools — register tools the LLM itself calls. Schema is JSON Schema; zot routes the model's
tool_callto the extension'stool_result. Same lifecycle as built-in tools (read/write/edit/bash/skill). -
Lifecycle hooks — subscribe to events (session_start, turn_start, tool_call, turn_end, assistant_message) for telemetry / audit / custom UI, or intercept tool calls before execution to refuse dangerous patterns.
On-disk layout
Each extension lives in its own directory:
~/Library/Application Support/zot/extensions/<name>/
├── extension.json # manifest (required)
└── <executable> # whatever exec points at
Or project-local: <project>/.zot/extensions/<name>/. Project-local
wins on name conflict.
For ad-hoc use during development, skip the install step entirely
and run zot --ext PATH (repeatable: -e PATH -e PATH).
Manifest
{
"name": "weather",
"version": "1.0.0",
"exec": "./weather",
"args": [],
"language": "go",
"description": "current weather lookups for any city",
"enabled": true
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 384 lines · 28 tokens per session scan C 0d64601b31b3
write-zot-extension is a skill published in the GitHub repository patriceckhart/zot (336 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 3,542 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cw-gates
Use before claiming any Codewhale change is done, green, or ready to land: the focused-to-broad verification ladder, the budget checks CI enforces, and the rules for what counts as a passing test.
cw-land
Use when turning verified Codewhale work into commits, branches, or a merge: choosing direct-main vs. worktree vs. integration branch, preserving contributor credit, and honoring the gate artifact before merging.
cw-slice
Use before writing code for any Codewhale feature, upgrade, or refactor: find the existing owner of the behavior, bound the change to one reviewable slice, and fix the evidence bar before you start.
cw-dogfood
Use when a Codewhale change needs proving in the real product, or when asked to build/install/dogfood the local binaries: stamped release build, atomic install, fresh-shell verification, and the manual QA that gates cannot cover.
cw-handoff
Use when writing a Codewhale takeover prompt, continuation note, or end-of-session summary for another agent or a later session: a paste-ready handoff grounded in live state, with done/suspected/blocked kept separate.
cw-orient
Use at the start of any Codewhale work session, or when unsure which checkout, branch, or worktree is authoritative: establish live repo truth before reading a plan or editing a file.