Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add patrickdappollonio/claude-plugins --skill implement-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/patrickdappollonio/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/patrickdappollonio/claude-plugins/implement-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/patrickdappollonio/claude-plugins/implement-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/patrickdappollonio/claude-plugins/implement-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/patrickdappollonio/claude-plugins/implement-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/patrickdappollonio/claude-plugins/implement-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00081 | $0.07857 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.03929 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.01571 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00786 |
Grade C, and why
implement-plan scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletehighDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
- Any `git worktree remove`, `git branch -d/-D`, or `rm -rf` of a worktree before the G4 answer How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 476 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Implement Plan
Overview
Turn an agreed plan into merged, reviewed, tested, documented code — hands-free where possible, and never deciding for the user what is theirs to decide. The orchestrator (you) plans the split, dispatches executors, checks their work against the plan thoroughly, runs an adversarial review, fixes what it finds, cleans up the comments and the shape of the code it merged, and keeps going until the plan is done.
The executor discipline in this skill (minimum sufficient change, the four-line mini-plan, pause-and-confirm, "done means") is adapted from @voxyz_ai. The orchestration around it — worktrees, conformance review, adversarial review, model routing, capacity, the keep-going contract — is this skill's own.
Three rules bind everything below:
- The plan is the spec. Work is measured against what was agreed, item by item — never against "does it look right".
- Technical direction is yours; operational and functional direction is the user's. Never assume for them. The table under Two Authorities decides which is which.
- Keep going. Stop only at the named gates, and when you stop, make the resume a single word.
Read the Companion Files First
This skill ships in two layers. SKILL.md carries the rules and a summary of
each step; six files beside it carry the full procedures:
handoff-packet.md— the executor prompt: scope, TDD, the test map, the documentation rule, user-journey tests, the executor discipline, stop conditionsconformance-review.md— the thorough plan-vs-work check, item by itemadversarial-review-fallback.md— how to run the installed review skills, the plan-as-diff variant, and the on-the-spot panel when no skill is installedmodel-routing.md— which model executes, which judges, and the trade you must statecapacity-check.md— the back-of-the-napkin estimate, the advisory usage check,/goal, and the resume linecompanion-skills.md— the skills this one uses when installed (adversarial-review,adversarial-review-quick,visual-plan,appropriate-comments-code,code-simplification,use-premium-models-efficiently,use-claude-limits-efficiently), what each adds, and how to install them on Claude Code, Codex, or vianpx skills
What ships with it
8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +11 lines d8f107860f1e
- yesterday Changed · +59 lines b8166cecaec8
- 6d ago First seen · 406 lines · 81 tokens per session scan C 29bb8e0e15fe
implement-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository patrickdappollonio/claude-plugins (8 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 81 tokens to every session and 7,857 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…