Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add patrickserrano/lacquer --skill xcode-build-orchestratorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/patrickserrano/lacquerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/patrickserrano/lacquer/xcode-build-orchestrator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/patrickserrano/lacquer/xcode-build-orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/patrickserrano/lacquer/xcode-build-orchestrator.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00094 | $0.02437 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00047 | $0.01218 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00487 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00244 |
Grade A, and why
xcode-build-orchestrator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to xcode-build-orchestrator — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 159 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Xcode Build Orchestrator
Use this skill as the recommend-first entrypoint for end-to-end Xcode build optimization work.
Non-Negotiable Rules
- Wall-clock build time (how long the developer waits) is the primary success metric. Every recommendation must state its expected impact on the developer's actual wait time.
- Start in recommendation mode.
- Benchmark before making changes.
- Do not modify project files, source files, packages, or scripts without explicit developer approval.
- Preserve the evidence trail for every recommendation.
- Re-benchmark after approved changes and report the wall-clock delta.
Two-Phase Workflow
The orchestration is designed as two distinct phases separated by developer review.
Phase 1 -- Analyze (recommend-only)
Run this phase in agent mode because the agent needs to execute builds, run benchmark scripts, write benchmark artifacts, and generate the optimization report. However, treat Phase 1 as recommend-only: do not modify any project files, source files, packages, or build settings. The only files the agent creates during this phase are benchmark artifacts and the optimization plan inside .build-benchmark/.
- Collect the build target context: workspace or project, scheme, configuration, destination, and current pain point. When both
.xcworkspaceand.xcodeprojexist, prefer.xcodeprojunless the workspace contains sub-projects required for the build. Workspaces that reference external projects may fail if those projects are not checked out. - Run
xcode-build-benchmarkto establish a baseline if no fresh benchmark exists. The benchmark script auto-detectsCOMPILATION_CACHE_ENABLE_CACHING = YESand includes cached clean builds that measure the realistic developer experience (warm cache). If the build fails to compile, checkgit logfor a recent buildable commit. When working in a worktree, cherry-picking a targeted build fix from a feature branch is acceptable to reach a buildable state. If SPM packages reference gitignored directories in theirexclude:paths (e.g.,__Snapshots__), create those directories before building -- worktrees do not contain gitignored content andxcodebuild -resolvePackageDependencieswill crash otherwise. - Verify the benchmark artifact has non-empty
timing_summary_categories. If empty, the timing summary parser may have failed -- re-parse the raw logs or inspect them manually. IfCOMPILATION_CACHE_ENABLE_CACHINGis enabled, also verify the artifact includescached_cleanruns.- Benchmark confidence check: For each build type (clean, cached clean, incremental), compare the min and max values. If the spread (max - min) exceeds 20% of the median, flag the benchmark as having high variance and recommend running additional repetitions (5+ runs) before drawing conclusions. High variance makes it difficult to distinguish real improvements from noise. After applying changes, only claim an improvement if the post-change median falls outside the baseline's min-max range.
- If incremental builds are the primary pain point and Xcode 16.4+ is available, recommend the developer enable Task Backtraces (Scheme Editor > Build tab > Build Debugging > "Task Backtraces"). This reveals why each task re-ran, which is critical for diagnosing unexpected replanning or input invalidation. Include any Task Backtrace evidence in the analysis.
- Determine whether compile tasks are likely blocking wall-clock progress or just consuming parallel CPU time. Compare the sum of all timing-summary category seconds against the wall-clock median: if the sum is 2x+ the median, most work is parallelized and compile hotspot fixes are unlikely to reduce wait time. If
SwiftCompile,CompileC,SwiftEmitModule, orPlanning Swift moduledominate the timing summary and appear likely to be on the critical path, rundiagnose_compilation.pyto capture type-checking hotspots. If they are parallelized, still run diagnostics but label findings as "parallel efficiency improvements" rather than "build time improvements." - Run the specialist analyses that fit the evidence by reading each skill's SKILL.md and applying its workflow:
- Merge findings into a single prioritized improvement plan.
- Generate the markdown optimization report using
generate_optimization_report.pyand save it to.build-benchmark/optimization-plan.md. This report includes the build settings audit, timing analysis, prioritized recommendations, and an approval checklist. - Stop and present the plan to the developer for review.
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/benchmark-artifacts.md 4.7 KB
- references/build-settings-best-practices.md 8.8 KB
- references/orchestration-report-template.md 6.6 KB
- references/recommendation-format.md 2.8 KB
- scripts/benchmark_builds.py 12 KB runs code
- scripts/diagnose_compilation.py 9.9 KB runs code
- scripts/generate_optimization_report.py 22 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 159 lines · 94 tokens per session scan A 8a750e793fb0
xcode-build-orchestrator is a skill published in the GitHub repository patrickserrano/lacquer (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 94 tokens to every session and 2,437 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to xcode-build-orchestrator, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
swiftui-whats-new-27
New SwiftUI APIs, behaviors, and deprecations introduced in the 2027 OS releases (iOS 27, macOS 27, watchOS 27, tvOS 27, visionOS 27). Use when a SwiftUI view using @State fails to compile with "used before being initialized", "invalid redeclaration of synthesized property", or "extraneous argument label" errors after…
expo-modules
Writing Swift/Kotlin native modules with the Expo Modules API, requireNativeModule, async functions, view modules, and the event-emitter pattern. Triggers on expo modules, native module, swift, kotlin, requireNativeModule, expo-module-scripts, expo.modules.json, view module, event emitter, native function, async…
cmp-upgrade
Migrate an existing Kotlin/Compose Multiplatform (CMP/KMP) project to the next PROVEN-GREEN dependency version set. Use this when the user wants to upgrade Kotlin, KSP, Compose Multiplatform, Room, AGP, Koin, or Ktor versions in a KMP project, bump their KMP dependencies, or asks "upgrade kotlin/compose/KMP versions"…
Swift Patterns
Use this skill when working on Swift projects (SwiftPM packages, iOS/macOS apps) and you want consistent patterns for concurrency, structure, and safety.
android-native-dev
Android native application development and UI design guide. Covers Material Design 3, Kotlin/Compose development, project configuration, accessibility, and build troubleshooting. Read this before Android native application development.
modernize-tests
Modernize test suites to use modern Swift Testing features or migrate from XCTest.