claude-code-my-workflow is a forkable setup for using Claude Code to produce and review academic papers, slides, data analyses, and replication packages. Researchers use its agents, skills, rules, hooks, and quality checks to coordinate these tasks and verify their results. The catalogue entries define the reusable workflow components for Claude Code.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/humanizenpx skills add pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --skill humanizegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/humanize)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/humanize"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/humanize.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00163 | $0.02830 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00081 | $0.01415 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00566 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00283 |
Grade A, and why
humanize scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 234 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/humanize — AI-voice audit (detect-and-flag)
Read the target file (or all paper-like files), audit for the canonical AI-voice tells in academic prose, and write a structured report. The skill does not rewrite. The author edits.
Why this skill exists
Referees and editors increasingly recognise AI-generated prose. The tells are not stylistic preferences — they're statistically conspicuous patterns the LLM training distribution produces at higher rates than human academic writers. Five reasons to audit before submission:
- Reviewer suspicion is a tax. Even good substance pays a credibility tax if the prose reads as AI-drafted.
- Journal policy is tightening. A growing number of venues require disclosure or prohibit AI-drafted text.
- AI tells signal weak content. Boilerplate transitions ("Moreover", "It is important to note") almost always cover up logical gaps the author didn't think through.
- You are not the tells. Even authors who use AI tools heavily can preserve their own voice by stripping the model's lexical fingerprint.
- The fix is cheap once you can see it. The cost is detection, not rewriting — once the report flags the tells, removal is mechanical.
What this skill is NOT
- Not a rewriter. No
--rewritemode. Auto-rewriting AI tells degrades prose quality (cross-vendor research finding); the author preserves voice by editing manually. - Not a substance reviewer. Use
/review-paperfor argument structure, identification, citations. - Not a grammar checker. Use
/proofreadfor grammar, typos, overflow, citation format. - Not a fact-checker. Use
/verify-claimsfor Chain-of-Verification fact-checking of citations and numeric claims.
/humanize is the voice lens. Run it alongside the others — none of them substitute.
When to use
- Before journal submission.
- Before posting a working paper / preprint / SSRN draft.
- After any AI-assisted prose generation (R&R response drafts, lit-review synthesis, abstract revisions).
- As a self-discipline pass after long writing sessions — your own writing drifts toward LLM patterns when you stare at LLM output all day.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 234 lines · 163 tokens per session scan A ce6aba2aa3f7
humanize is a skill published in the GitHub repository pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow (1,562 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 163 tokens to every session and 2,830 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
paper-workflow
经管 / 社科实证论文全流程 meta-orchestrator：把选题、设计、数据、估计、方法闸门、 表图、写作、去 AI 味、质量门、修订、投稿与复盘编排成 Stage 0–9 可断点续跑流水线。 本 skill 不重复实现子能力，而是按阶段调用既有 skill 或并行 subagent，并在 Stage 3–4 路由 Python/StatsPAI、Stata、R 三种分析后端，Stage 9 交付一份含正文+表+图+参考文献的 Word 全文定稿（09submission/main.docx，另可出 .tex）。触发：/paper-workflow、 帮我写一篇实证论文、从选题到投稿、端到端 empirical…
econ-management-paper-polish
Writing, revision, review, evidence, journal adaptation, and method-safety support for economics, management, finance, accounting, marketing, information systems, public administration, and related business-school papers. Routes by discipline, subfield, language, method, outlet, section, and task mode while preserving…
did-causal
Use this Skill when the user needs to estimate causal treatment effects using difference-in-differences (DID) designs: two-way fixed effects (TWFE) regression, parallel trends pre-testing, Callaway-Sant'Anna staggered adoption estimator, and Goodman-Bacon decomposition. Covers both Python (linearmodels) and R (did…
fin-paper-convert
Compile LaTeX to PDF and convert to target journal format.
fin-paper-figure
Generate academic-quality figures (>=300 DPI) for economics and finance papers.
fin-full-pipeline
经济金融研究端到端完整流程。从研究想法到可投稿论文，覆盖文献综述、想法生成、新颖性验证、实证方法设计、论文大纲、正文写作、图表生成、LaTeX编译和投稿前检查。.