claude-code-my-workflow is a forkable setup for using Claude Code to produce and review academic papers, slides, data analyses, and replication packages. Researchers use its agents, skills, rules, hooks, and quality checks to coordinate these tasks and verify their results. The catalogue entries define the reusable workflow components for Claude Code.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --skill r-package-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/r-package-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/r-package-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/r-package-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/r-package-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/r-package-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00113 | $0.01510 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00056 | $0.00755 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00302 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00151 |
Grade A, and why
r-package-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 139 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/r-package-check — R Package Release Gate
Run the document → test → check → triage pipeline that decides whether an R package is releasable, then review the source for the issues R CMD check cannot see.
Input: $ARGUMENTS — the package root (a directory containing DESCRIPTION). If blank, autodetect by searching upward/within the working directory for DESCRIPTION.
Constraints
- Follow
.claude/rules/r-package-conventions.md— the CRAN-readiness bar (0 errors, 0 warnings, explained notes) is the gate. - Treat
man/andNAMESPACEas generated — regenerate withdevtools::document(); never hand-edit them. - Run the
r-package-revieweragent on the source before declaring the package releasable. - Do not bump the version or write to CRAN. This skill checks; the human decides when to submit.
Workflow Phases
Phase 0: Pre-Flight Report
## Pre-Flight Report — R Package Check
**Package:** [name + version from DESCRIPTION]
**Root:** [path]
**Exported functions:** [from NAMESPACE / `@export` count]
**Dependencies:** Imports [list] · Suggests [list] · Depends [list]
**Toolchain available:** devtools [✓/✗], roxygen2 [✓/✗], testthat [✓/✗], R CMD [✓/✗], covr [✓/✗]
**Plan:** document → test → check --as-cran → triage → review
Detect the toolchain with a quick probe; if devtools/R CMD is missing, stop and tell the user what to install.
Rscript -e 'cat("devtools:", requireNamespace("devtools", quietly=TRUE),
"roxygen2:", requireNamespace("roxygen2", quietly=TRUE),
"testthat:", requireNamespace("testthat", quietly=TRUE),
"covr:", requireNamespace("covr", quietly=TRUE), "\n")'
Phase 1: Document
Regenerate man/ + NAMESPACE and detect drift (generated docs that were not committed):
Rscript -e 'devtools::document("[pkg]")'
git -C "[pkg]" status --short man/ NAMESPACE # any diff = generated docs were stale
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 139 lines · 113 tokens per session scan A 807c2dab6553
r-package-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow (1,569 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 113 tokens to every session and 1,510 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
paper-workflow
A staged workflow for producing an evidence-based economics or social-science research paper, from choosing a topic through submission. It coordinates existing tools and analysis options, including Python, Stata, and R.
r-econometrics
Run IV, DiD, and RDD analyses in R with proper diagnostics.
econ-management-paper-polish
A writing and editing guide for papers in economics, management, finance, accounting, marketing, information systems, public administration, and related fields.
did-causal
Use this Skill when the user needs to estimate causal treatment effects using difference-in-differences (DID) designs: two-way fixed effects (TWFE) regression, parallel trends pre-testing, Callaway-Sant'Anna staggered adoption estimator, and Goodman-Bacon decomposition. Covers both Python (linearmodels) and R (did…
test-native-extension
Validate a third-party control repo across four automated layers plus one printed manual recipe. Layer 1 asserts native-source structure (Android getName() and iOS +moduleName to manifest nativeModule; @ReactMethod / RCTEXPORTMETHOD to methods; no @ReactModule) plus load/init readiness (ReactPackage public no-arg…
test-site
Tests a deployed, activated Power Pages site at runtime using browser-based navigation, page crawling, and API request verification via Playwright. Use when the user wants to test, verify, or smoke-test their deployed site.