Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add PedroMosquera/squadai --skill test-driven-developmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PedroMosquera/squadaiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedromosquera/squadai/test-driven-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedromosquera/squadai/test-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedromosquera/squadai/test-driven-development/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedromosquera/squadai/test-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedromosquera/squadai/test-driven-development.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00665 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00266 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00133 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00067 |
Grade A, and why
test-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test-Driven Development Skill
Implement code using the red-green-refactor cycle. This skill is used by the Implementer to write code driven by failing tests.
Core Principle
Write the MINIMUM code to make a failing test pass. No more. Then refactor to improve quality without changing behavior.
Steps
Phase 1: RED (write a failing test)
- Pick the next test from the implementation plan.
- Write the test code first, before any implementation.
- Run the test: it MUST fail (red). If it passes without implementation, the test is not testing the right thing.
- Read the failure message. It tells you exactly what to implement.
Phase 2: GREEN (make the test pass)
- Write the MINIMUM implementation to make the failing test pass.
- No extra logic, no anticipated future use cases
- Hardcoding is acceptable at this stage if it makes the test pass
- Copy-paste is acceptable if it moves quickly to green
- Run the test: it MUST pass (green).
- Run ALL tests: ensure no regressions.
- Do NOT refactor yet.
Phase 3: REFACTOR (improve the code)
- Only after tests are green, improve code quality.
- Remove duplication
- Improve naming
- Extract helper functions
- Simplify logic
- Run tests after every change; refactoring must not break anything.
- Do NOT add new behavior during refactoring.
- When satisfied, move to the next test in the plan.
Rules
- Never skip the red phase; always write the test first
- Never write more code than needed to pass the current test
- Never refactor while red; only refactor on green
- Commit after each green-refactor cycle (small, frequent commits)
- If a test is hard to write, it signals a design problem, so fix the design
Test Structure
Follow table-driven tests for multiple scenarios:
func TestFunctionName(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
input InputType
want OutputType
wantErr bool
}{
{name: "happy path", input: ..., want: ..., wantErr: false},
{name: "empty input", input: ..., want: ..., wantErr: true},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
got, err := FunctionName(tt.input)
if (err != nil) != tt.wantErr {
t.Errorf("unexpected error: %v", err)
}
if got != tt.want {
t.Errorf("got %v, want %v", got, tt.want)
}
})
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago Changed 951780ff34fe
- 1mo ago First seen · 92 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 54032c8a9961
test-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository PedroMosquera/squadai (10 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 665 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
red-green-refactor
Guides the red-green-refactor TDD workflow: write a failing test first, implement the minimum code to make it pass, then refactor while keeping tests green. Use when a user asks to practice TDD, write tests first, follow red-green-refactor, do test-driven development, write failing tests before code, or phrases like…
am-command-build
Implement the next task incrementally — build, test, verify, commit.
test-driven-development
Drives development with tests. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Use when you need to prove that code works, when a bug report arrives, or when you're about to modify existing functionality.
test-driven-development
Drives development with tests using the red-green-refactor loop. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Use when you need to prove that code works, when a bug report arrives, or when you're about to modify existing functionality. Use when asked to add tests to a function, fix a bug…
workflow-patterns
Use this skill when implementing tasks according to Conductor's TDD workflow, handling phase checkpoints, managing git commits for tasks, or understanding the verification protocol.
skillshare-implement-feature
Implement a feature from a spec file or description using TDD workflow. Use this skill whenever the user asks to: add a new CLI command, implement a feature from a spec, build new functionality, add a flag, create a new internal package, or write Go code for skillshare. This skill enforces test-first development…