Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add personamanagmentlayer/pcl --skill blockchain-expertgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/personamanagmentlayer/pclWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/personamanagmentlayer/pcl/blockchain-expert)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/personamanagmentlayer/pcl/blockchain-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/personamanagmentlayer/pcl/blockchain-expert/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/personamanagmentlayer/pcl/blockchain-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/personamanagmentlayer/pcl/blockchain-expert.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.02728 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01364 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00546 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00273 |
Grade A, and why
blockchain-expert scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 419 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Blockchain Expert
Expert guidance for blockchain development, smart contracts, Web3 applications, DeFi protocols, and cryptocurrency systems.
Core Concepts
Blockchain Fundamentals
- Distributed ledger technology
- Consensus mechanisms (PoW, PoS, PoA)
- Cryptographic hashing
- Public/private key cryptography
- Transaction validation
- Block structure and chain
Smart Contracts
- Solidity programming
- Gas optimization
- Security patterns
- Upgradeable contracts
- Testing and auditing
- Contract interactions
Web3 & DeFi
- Decentralized applications (dApps)
- DeFi protocols (AMM, lending, staking)
- NFTs and token standards
- Layer 2 solutions
- Cross-chain bridges
- Wallet integration
Smart Contract Development
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.8.20;
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/security/ReentrancyGuard.sol";
contract SimpleToken is ERC20, Ownable, ReentrancyGuard {
uint256 public constant MAX_SUPPLY = 1000000 * 10**18;
mapping(address => bool) public minters;
event MinterAdded(address indexed minter);
event MinterRemoved(address indexed minter);
modifier onlyMinter() {
require(minters[msg.sender], "Not a minter");
_;
}
constructor() ERC20("SimpleToken", "SMPL") {
minters[msg.sender] = true;
}
function mint(address to, uint256 amount) external onlyMinter {
require(totalSupply() + amount <= MAX_SUPPLY, "Max supply exceeded");
_mint(to, amount);
}
function burn(uint256 amount) external {
_burn(msg.sender, amount);
}
function addMinter(address minter) external onlyOwner {
minters[minter] = true;
emit MinterAdded(minter);
}
function removeMinter(address minter) external onlyOwner {
minters[minter] = false;
emit MinterRemoved(minter);
}
}
// Staking Contract
contract StakingPool is ReentrancyGuard {
IERC20 public stakingToken;
IERC20 public rewardToken;
uint256 public rewardRate = 100; // Reward tokens per second
uint256 public lastUpdateTime;
uint256 public rewardPerTokenStored;
mapping(address => uint256) public userRewardPerTokenPaid;
mapping(address => uint256) public rewards;
mapping(address => uint256) public balances;
uint256 private _totalSupply;
constructor(address _stakingToken, address _rewardToken) {
stakingToken = IERC20(_stakingToken);
rewardToken = IERC20(_rewardToken);
}
function rewardPerToken() public view returns (uint256) {
if (_totalSupply == 0) {
return rewardPerTokenStored;
}
return rewardPerTokenStored +
(((block.timestamp - lastUpdateTime) * rewardRate * 1e18) / _totalSupply);
}
function earned(address account) public view returns (uint256) {
return ((balances[account] *
(rewardPerToken() - userRewardPerTokenPaid[account])) / 1e18) +
rewards[account];
}
modifier updateReward(address account) {
rewardPerTokenStored = rewardPerToken();
lastUpdateTime = block.timestamp;
if (account != address(0)) {
rewards[account] = earned(account);
userRewardPerTokenPaid[account] = rewardPerTokenStored;
}
_;
}
function stake(uint256 amount) external nonReentrant updateReward(msg.sender) {
require(amount > 0, "Cannot stake 0");
_totalSupply += amount;
balances[msg.sender] += amount;
stakingToken.transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), amount);
}
function withdraw(uint256 amount) external nonReentrant updateReward(msg.sender) {
require(amount > 0, "Cannot withdraw 0");
_totalSupply -= amount;
balances[msg.sender] -= amount;
stakingToken.transfer(msg.sender, amount);
}
function getReward() external nonReentrant updateReward(msg.sender) {
uint256 reward = rewards[msg.sender];
if (reward > 0) {
rewards[msg.sender] = 0;
rewardToken.transfer(msg.sender, reward);
}
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · +6 lines · +42 tokens per session e2b8e2b4e219
- 9d ago First seen · 413 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A a5883bc8fe29
blockchain-expert is a skill published in the GitHub repository personamanagmentlayer/pcl (40 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 2,728 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
Web3 & Blockchain Development
Production-grade Web3 development with Solidity smart contracts, ethers.js/web3.js integration, DApp architecture, security patterns, and AI-enhanced blockchain development (ChatWeb3, Aider + Gemini 2024).
analyzing-ethereum-smart-contract-vulnerabilities
Perform static and symbolic analysis of Solidity smart contracts using Slither and Mythril to detect reentrancy, integer overflow, access control, and other vulnerability classes before deployment to Ethereum mainnet.
analyzing-ethereum-smart-contract-vulnerabilities
Perform static and symbolic analysis of Solidity smart contracts using Slither and Mythril to detect reentrancy, integer overflow, access control, and other vulnerability classes before deployment to Ethereum mainnet.
solidity-language-docs
Solidity 0.8.36 — smart contracts, types, functions, modifiers, events, inheritance, libraries, assembly, ABI.
analyzing-ethereum-smart-contract-vulnerabilities
A security-analysis guide for Solidity smart contracts, which are programs that run on the Ethereum blockchain. It uses Slither and Mythril to inspect contract code and execution paths for vulnerabilities.
analyzing-ethereum-smart-contract-vulnerabilities
Perform static and symbolic analysis of Solidity smart contracts using Slither and Mythril to detect reentrancy, integer overflow, access control, and other vulnerability classes before deployment to Ethereum mainnet.