Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add personamanagmentlayer/pcl --skill research-expertgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/personamanagmentlayer/pclWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/personamanagmentlayer/pcl/research-expert)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/personamanagmentlayer/pcl/research-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/personamanagmentlayer/pcl/research-expert/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/personamanagmentlayer/pcl/research-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/personamanagmentlayer/pcl/research-expert.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.02635 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.01054 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00527 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00264 |
Grade A, and why
research-expert scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 390 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Research Methodology Expert
Expert guidance for research methodology, experimental design, statistical analysis, and academic writing.
Core Concepts
Research Design
- Experimental vs observational studies
- Randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
- Cross-sectional, longitudinal, cohort studies
- Case-control studies
- Systematic reviews and meta-analysis
- Sample size determination
Statistical Analysis
- Descriptive statistics
- Hypothesis testing
- Confidence intervals
- Regression analysis
- ANOVA and t-tests
- Non-parametric tests
- Multiple testing correction
Academic Writing
- Literature review
- Research proposals
- Manuscript structure (IMR AD)
- Citation management
- Peer review process
- Publishing ethics
Experimental Design
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import List, Optional
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
@dataclass
class Study:
name: str
design_type: str # 'RCT', 'observational', 'cohort'
sample_size: int
groups: List[str]
primary_outcome: str
secondary_outcomes: List[str]
class SampleSizeCalculator:
"""Calculate required sample size for studies"""
@staticmethod
def two_sample_ttest(effect_size: float, alpha: float = 0.05,
power: float = 0.8) -> int:
"""Calculate sample size for two-sample t-test"""
from statsmodels.stats.power import tt_ind_solve_power
n = tt_ind_solve_power(
effect_size=effect_size,
alpha=alpha,
power=power,
alternative='two-sided'
)
return int(np.ceil(n))
@staticmethod
def proportion_test(p1: float, p2: float, alpha: float = 0.05,
power: float = 0.8) -> int:
"""Calculate sample size for comparing proportions"""
from statsmodels.stats.power import zt_ind_solve_power
effect_size = (p2 - p1) / np.sqrt(p1 * (1 - p1))
n = zt_ind_solve_power(
effect_size=effect_size,
alpha=alpha,
power=power,
alternative='two-sided'
)
return int(np.ceil(n))
class ExperimentalDesign:
"""Design and randomize experimental studies"""
def __init__(self, n_subjects: int, n_groups: int):
self.n_subjects = n_subjects
self.n_groups = n_groups
def simple_randomization(self) -> List[int]:
"""Simple random assignment to groups"""
return np.random.choice(self.n_groups, size=self.n_subjects)
def block_randomization(self, block_size: int) -> List[int]:
"""Block randomization for balanced groups"""
n_blocks = self.n_subjects // block_size
assignments = []
for _ in range(n_blocks):
block = np.repeat(range(self.n_groups),
block_size // self.n_groups)
np.random.shuffle(block)
assignments.extend(block)
# Handle remaining subjects
remainder = self.n_subjects % block_size
if remainder > 0:
extra = np.random.choice(self.n_groups, size=remainder)
assignments.extend(extra)
return assignments
def stratified_randomization(self, strata: List[str]) -> List[int]:
"""Stratified randomization by covariates"""
assignments = np.zeros(self.n_subjects, dtype=int)
for stratum in set(strata):
stratum_indices = [i for i, s in enumerate(strata) if s == stratum]
stratum_n = len(stratum_indices)
stratum_assignments = np.random.choice(
self.n_groups,
size=stratum_n,
replace=True
)
for idx, assignment in zip(stratum_indices, stratum_assignments):
assignments[idx] = assignment
return assignments
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +10 lines · +32 tokens per session 41eb1f94b096
- 1mo ago First seen · 380 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A c1e66ad81245
research-expert is a skill published in the GitHub repository personamanagmentlayer/pcl (44 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 2,635 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
neuroskill-bci
Use live BCI cognitive and mood state from NeuroSkill.
saelens
Train sparse autoencoders to interpret model features.
jupyter-notebook
Iterative Python via live Jupyter kernel (hamelnb).
bioinformatics
Gateway to 400+ genomics and computational biology skills.
free-llm-apis
Guide users through obtaining and configuring free API keys for LLM providers. Use when the user wants to set up a free LLM API, get a free API key, connect to a free model provider, configure an OpenAI-compatible endpoint at no cost, or asks about free tiers for AI models. Triggers on "free API key", "free LLM", "set…
clawrouter
Hosted-gateway LLM router — save 84% on inference costs. A local proxy that forwards each request to the blockrun.ai gateway, which routes to the cheapest capable model across 90 models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, DeepSeek, xAI, Z.AI, and more. Free open-weight models included. Also exposes realtime market data…