Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/peterfei/forge-skill/double-diamond-skillnpx skills add peterfei/forge-skill --skill double-diamond-skillgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/peterfei/forge-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/peterfei/forge-skill/double-diamond-skill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/peterfei/forge-skill/double-diamond-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/peterfei/forge-skill/double-diamond-skill.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00082 | $0.02636 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.01318 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00527 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00264 |
Grade A, and why
double-diamond-skill scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 175 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
双钻模型 · 思维工具
"The Double Diamond is a visual representation of the design and innovation process. It's a simple way to describe the steps taken in any design and innovation project." — British Design Council
激活条件与触发词
- 直接调用：「用双钻模型分析...」「discover define...」
- 语义触发：用户面对模糊的复杂问题需要结构化流程、不确定该怎样从问题到方案
- 组合调用：「先用双钻模型走完整流程，再用设计思维的共情方法做 Discover」
方法框架概览
双钻模型的核心是两轮发散收敛的结构化探索，它通过先探索问题空间再探索方案空间、每个空间先发散再收敛来确保解决正确的问题并用正确的方式解决。
核心原理（3-7个，每个须附 ≥2 个跨域证据）
原理 1: 先发散后收敛是解决复杂问题的基本节奏
一句话定义：不要急着找答案——先尽可能多的发现可能性，再集中精力选出最优解。
跨域证据：
- 创意设计：IDEO 项目开始时不画图而是广泛观察用户行为（发散），然后聚集到最有启发的洞察（收敛）（来源：Kelley, The Art of Innovation, 2001）
- 科学研究：科学发现遵循"产生假设（发散）→设计实验证实/证伪（收敛）"的循环（来源：Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, 1934）
应用方式：在每个阶段开始之前明确问"现在是发散还是收敛阶段？"。发散时禁止评估，收敛时禁止发散。
局限：发散需要时间。在极度时间受限的场景中可能跳过发散直接收敛（即凭经验直觉判断）。
原理 2: 问题空间和方案空间需分别探索
一句话定义：花时间找到一个正确的问题，比快速解决一个错误的问题更有价值。
跨域证据：
- 企业转型：BBC 数字化转型先花 6 个月理解"观众在数字时代真正需要什么"（问题空间）再设计数字化产品（方案空间）（来源：BBC, Digital Transformation Case, 2010）
- 产品战略：Vettery 重设计前花大量时间研究"招聘经理最痛苦的不是找简历而是筛选"（重新定义问题）然后重新设计产品（来源：Vettery Product Redesign, 2017）
应用方式：在开始想方案之前，先确认你真正确认了正确的问题。用 HMW 格式重写问题≥3 次。
局限：某些场景（如紧急 bug 修复）无法承受两轮完整探索。
原理 3: 重新定义问题比匆忙给出方案更有价值
一句话定义：大多数公司失败不是因为解错题而是因为做错了题。
跨域证据：
- 交通出行：Uber 不解决"怎么让更多人坐出租车"而是重新定义为"如何让任何人随时获得可靠交通"（来源：Kalanick interviews, 2012-2015）
- 住宿：Airbnb 不解决"怎么让酒店更便宜"而是重新定义为"怎么让人在任何地方找到住的地方"（来源：Chesky, Airbnb Origin Story, 2016）
应用方式：在你给出任何方案之前，用三种不同方式重新定义问题。选那个最大胆但有逻辑支撑的定义。
局限：过度重新定义可能导致拖延。"完美定义问题"不可得，需要在充分定义后敢于行动。
原理 4: 四阶段各有不同思维模式和产出
一句话定义：Discover→Define→Develop→Deliver 不是流水线，是认知状态切换。
跨域证据：
- 设计咨询：IDEO 在每个阶段结束时用不同的 criteria 评估产出（Discover 阶段用洞察深度、Define 阶段用问题清晰度、Develop 阶段用方案广度、Deliver 阶段用可行性）（来源：IDEO, Human-Centered Design Toolkit, 2011）
- 软件开发：Agile 的"发现-交付"双轨制本质上是双钻模型的工程化实现（来源：Sy, Dual-Track Agile, 2016）
应用方式：每进入一个阶段前，先问"这个阶段我的产出是什么？怎么判断这个产出够好了？"
局限：现实中阶段之间有大量回跳和重叠。双钻是框架不是操作手册。
操作协议（Agentic Protocol）
Step 1: 问题分类
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 175 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A 564bf86c6304
double-diamond-skill is a skill published in the GitHub repository peterfei/forge-skill (13 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 2,636 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
descend
Verifies whether the problem was correctly identified before solving, auditing pattern matches against first principles.
fundraising-narrative
This skill should be used when the user asks about "pitch deck", "fundraising story", "investor pitch", "VC narrative", "pitch narrative", "fundraising deck", "pitch structure", "Sequoia format", "why now slide", "market size slide", "TAM SAM SOM", "earned secret", "value hypothesis", "product-market fit"…
investor-relations
This skill should be used when the user asks about "investor update", "board deck", "board meeting", "investor communication", "monthly update", "quarterly update", "investor email", "bad news investors", "pivot communication", "crisis communication investors", "investor ask", "warm intro", "VC relationship"…
ux-principles
User research, usability heuristics, user psychology, accessibility, inclusive design, user testing, and UX metrics.
opencli-sitemap-author
Use when creating or maintaining OpenCLI site sitemaps: agent-facing navigation, page-state, action, workflow, API-reference, pitfall, and fallback knowledge for a website. Use after browser exploration discovers durable site context, when a sitemap is stale, or when promoting local site knowledge into the repo.
specification-writing
Write the full patent specification from claims and invention disclosure. Use when user says "撰写说明书", "write specification", "写说明书", "patent description", or wants to draft the complete patent specification.