Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add petrkindlmann/qa-skills --skill compliance-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/petrkindlmann/qa-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/petrkindlmann/qa-skills/compliance-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/petrkindlmann/qa-skills/compliance-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/petrkindlmann/qa-skills/compliance-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/petrkindlmann/qa-skills/compliance-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/petrkindlmann/qa-skills/compliance-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Anti-Refusal · line 115 Skill instructs the agent to omit warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Stripping safety caveats hides risk from the user and is a common jailbreak preamble.Fix: Remove instructions that suppress warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Let the agent surface safety-relevant caveats to the user.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 54 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 166 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00183 | $0.04318 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00073 | $0.01727 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00037 | $0.00864 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00432 |
Grade A, and why
compliance-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 203 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Discovery Questions
First, check for .agents/qa-project-context.md in the project root — it carries applicable regulations, CMP details, ad networks, and geographic scope. Skip any question already answered there. If it is missing, suggest creating one with the qa-project-context skill.
Applicable regulations
- Which privacy and platform regulations apply? This sets the entire test matrix.
- EU: GDPR, ePrivacy Directive (cookies), Digital Services Act (DSA, applied 17 Feb 2024), EU AI Act (prohibitions + AI literacy live since 2 Feb 2025; GPAI obligations + penalties since 2 Aug 2025; Article 50 transparency from 2 Aug 2026 — high-risk obligations postponed, see below).
- US: CCPA/CPRA and the state laws applicable to the audience. Record the specific opt-out and universal-signal requirements in the regional policy matrix.
- UK: UK GDPR/DPA, PECR (cookies), Online Safety Act 2023, Data Use and Access Act (DUAA).
- Other: LGPD (Brazil), PIPEDA (Canada), POPIA (South Africa).
- What is the legal basis for processing? Consent (opt-in), legitimate interest, or contractual necessity — this decides whether explicit consent must precede processing.
- Is there a DPO or legal team? They define the legal requirements; this skill only validates the technical implementation against them.
Consent management
- What CMP and advertising products are in use? The CMP sets the storage format, API, and integration. Record the current certification and TCF requirements for the specific products and regions; do not infer them from a CMP API response or a numeric policy-version comparison.
- What consent categories exist? Typically Strictly Necessary (always on), Analytics/Performance, Functional/Preferences, Marketing/Targeting.
- How is consent signaled to third-party scripts? IAB TCF v2 (
__tcfapi), a custom data layer, or direct CMP API? - Is Google Consent Mode basic or advanced, and what defaults does the regional policy require? Basic blocks tags until consent; advanced can send permitted measurements without cookies while storage consent is denied. This changes the pre-consent network assertion. See Google's implementation guide.
- What proves each consent transition has completed? Identify an application/CMP completion signal that includes scheduled tag work. A visible banner or
networkidlecannot establish that no delayed tracking will occur.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed dd4f0a82586b
- 4d ago Changed · +6 lines d97b535a3b4c
- 1mo ago First seen · 197 lines · 183 tokens per session scan A 6d81e060e4d0
compliance-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository petrkindlmann/qa-skills (208 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 183 tokens to every session and 4,318 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
CI Pipeline Optimizer
Optimize CI test pipelines through intelligent test splitting, parallelization, caching strategies, and selective test execution based on code changes.
Flaky Test Quarantine
Detect, quarantine, and systematically fix flaky tests with automated retry analysis, root cause categorization, and CI pipeline integration for test reliability.
CI/CD Pipeline Advanced
Expert-level CI/CD pipeline skill for test automation. Covers GitHub Actions, Jenkins, GitLab CI, Azure DevOps, parallel execution, matrix strategies, caching, artifact management, and deployment gates.
Checkly Monitoring as Code
Teach agents to build synthetic monitoring as code with Checkly, including Playwright browser checks, API checks, alerting, and CI deploy workflows.
CI Test Sharding Parallelization
Teach agents to shard and parallelize Playwright, Jest, and pytest suites in CI to reduce wall-clock time while merging reports reliably.
Advanced Chaos Engineering
Advanced chaos engineering patterns using Chaos Monkey, Litmus, and Gremlin for testing distributed system resilience under failure conditions.