Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add petrkindlmann/qa-skills --skill qa-project-bootstrapgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/petrkindlmann/qa-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/petrkindlmann/qa-skills/qa-project-bootstrap)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/petrkindlmann/qa-skills/qa-project-bootstrap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/petrkindlmann/qa-skills/qa-project-bootstrap/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/petrkindlmann/qa-skills/qa-project-bootstrap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/petrkindlmann/qa-skills/qa-project-bootstrap.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 110 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 308 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00124 | $0.04515 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00062 | $0.02257 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00903 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00451 |
Grade A, and why
qa-project-bootstrap scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 332 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Before starting: Check for .agents/qa-project-context.md in the project root. If it exists, it answers most discovery questions and provides the technical context for onboarding. If it does not, creating it is the first action item.
Quick Route
This skill serves three distinct jobs. Identify yours, jump to the section, skip the rest.
| Situation | Jump to | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Onboarding a new person to an existing team | First 30 Days Checklist → Mentorship Patterns | A 30-day ramp plan with owners and dates |
| Inherited an existing suite with no onboarding/docs | Test Architecture Audit (scope by team_maturity) |
A 1-2 page findings doc, five dimensions |
| Need the reference doc for anyone writing tests | Framework Walkthrough Template | A project-specific walkthrough.md |
A real onboarding usually needs all three; a quick health check needs only the audit.
Discovery Questions
Who Is Being Onboarded?
-
New QA engineer or developer contributing to tests? QA engineers need test strategy context and codebase orientation. Developers contributing tests need framework patterns and conventions. The ramp-up path differs significantly.
-
Experience level with the test framework? First time with Playwright/Cypress/pytest? Experienced but new to this codebase? Advanced and just needs conventions? This determines how much framework walkthrough to include.
-
Solo QA or joining an existing QA team? Solo QA needs to establish conventions from scratch. Joining a team means learning existing patterns and contributing within established norms.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 332 lines · 124 tokens per session scan A b4ee1e0bf460
qa-project-bootstrap is a skill published in the GitHub repository petrkindlmann/qa-skills (114 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 124 tokens to every session and 4,515 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
Jira QA Workflows
Run QA work in Jira like a professional, bug lifecycle and triage, JQL queries for testers, quality dashboards, sprint QA rituals, and REST API automation for bulk bug operations and reporting.
sprint-testing
Orchestrates in-sprint manual QA per issue across Stages 1 (Planning), 2 (Execution) and 3 (Reporting). Use for user-story testing, bug retesting, and sprint-wide QA loops. Creates the PBI folder, drives session-start, runs the triage + veto + risk-score decision tree on bugs, produces the ATP + ATR + TC artifacts in…
multi-role-quality-synthesis
Use this skill when multiple role reports for one quality stage must be combined into a traceable synthesis; triggers include multi-role quality synthesis, role report consolidation, disagreement summary..
project-delivery-perspective
Use this skill when project delivery constraints or action tracking are needed for test strategy, test strategy review, or test report review; triggers include project delivery perspective, delivery planning, schedule and capacity..
sprint-testing-workflow
Use this skill when you need a sprint-based QA workflow from planning through review and retrospective; triggers include sprint testing workflow and iteration QA workflow.
Feature Flag Testing
Testing feature flag implementations including flag evaluation, gradual rollout verification, fallback behavior, and flag cleanup detection.