Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to petrsovadina/CzechMedMCP. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/petrsovadina/CzechMedMCP/main/.claude/skills/speckit-analyze/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/petrsovadina/CzechMedMCPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/petrsovadina/czechmedmcp/speckit-analyze)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/petrsovadina/czechmedmcp/speckit-analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/petrsovadina/czechmedmcp/speckit-analyze/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/petrsovadina/czechmedmcp/speckit-analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/petrsovadina/czechmedmcp/speckit-analyze.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.01688 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00844 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00338 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00169 |
Grade A, and why
speckit-analyze scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to speckit-analyze — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 194 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Goal
Identify inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, and underspecified items across the three core artifacts (spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md) before implementation. This command MUST run only after /speckit.tasks has successfully produced a complete tasks.md.
Operating Constraints
STRICTLY READ-ONLY: Do not modify any files. Output a structured analysis report. Offer an optional remediation plan (user must explicitly approve before any follow-up editing commands would be invoked manually).
Constitution Authority: The project constitution (.specify/memory/constitution.md) is non-negotiable within this analysis scope. Constitution conflicts are automatically CRITICAL and require adjustment of the spec, plan, or tasks—not dilution, reinterpretation, or silent ignoring of the principle. If a principle itself needs to change, that must occur in a separate, explicit constitution update outside /speckit.analyze.
Execution Steps
1. Initialize Analysis Context
Run .specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasks once from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS. Derive absolute paths:
- SPEC = FEATURE_DIR/spec.md
- PLAN = FEATURE_DIR/plan.md
- TASKS = FEATURE_DIR/tasks.md
Abort with an error message if any required file is missing (instruct the user to run missing prerequisite command). For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
2. Load Artifacts (Progressive Disclosure)
Load only the minimal necessary context from each artifact:
From spec.md:
- Overview/Context
- Functional Requirements
- Success Criteria (measurable outcomes — e.g., performance, security, availability, user success, business impact)
- User Stories
- Edge Cases (if present)
From plan.md:
- Architecture/stack choices
- Data Model references
- Phases
- Technical constraints
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 194 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A bb4a7b1a6c75
speckit-analyze is a skill published in the GitHub repository petrsovadina/CzechMedMCP (1 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 1,688 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to speckit-analyze, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
detecting-pv-signals
Computes disproportionality signals — PRR, ROR, EBGM, and IC (BCPNN) — over FAERS / OpenFDA drug-event data to flag potential safety signals. Use when the user wants to mine spontaneous-report data for drug-reaction associations, build a 2x2 contingency table, compute a Proportional Reporting Ratio or Reporting Odds…
auditing-deidentification-runs
Produce a signed, reproducible, no-PHI audit trail for an OpenMed de-identification run via deidentify(audit=True). Use when the user needs compliance evidence, a tamper-evident record of what was redacted and why, to verify nothing was changed, to retain proof for HIPAA/GDPR audits, or to review de-id decisions…
batch-processing-clinical-text
Run large-scale batch NER, PII extraction, or de-identification over many clinical notes on-device with OpenMed, with sharding, checkpointing, resumability, and append-only JSONL output. Use when the user needs to process a corpus or folder of notes, de-identify a dataset, run NER over thousands of documents, build a…
coding-hcc-risk-adjustment
Maps chronic conditions extracted by OpenMed to CMS-HCC V28 risk-adjustment categories and estimates a RAF (Risk Adjustment Factor) score as decision support. Use when the user wants to surface risk-adjustable diagnoses from notes, map ICD-10-CM codes to HCC categories, estimate or reconcile a patient/panel RAF, find…
coding-icd10
Suggests candidate ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes (and ICD-10-PCS procedure codes) for diagnoses and procedures extracted by OpenMed, with rationale and a human-coder caveat. Use when the user wants to code a problem list, map a diagnosis span to a billable ICD-10-CM code, route a finding to the right chapter, cross-walk…
defining-cohort-phenotypes
Authors computable phenotype and cohort definitions in the OHDSI ATLAS / CIRCE style over the OMOP CDM, combining standard concept sets with NLP-derived features that OpenMed extracts. Use when the user wants to define a patient cohort, write a computable phenotype, reuse PheKB or OHDSI Phenotype Library logic, build…