Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/traverse-framework/traverse/speckit-analyzenpx skills add traverse-framework/traverse --skill speckit-analyzegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/traverse-framework/traverseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/traverse-framework/traverse/speckit-analyze)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/traverse-framework/traverse/speckit-analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/traverse-framework/traverse/speckit-analyze.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01662 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00831 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00332 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00166 |
Grade A, and why
speckit-analyze scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
81% identical to speckit-analyze — 72 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 191 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Goal
Identify inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, and underspecified items across the three core artifacts (spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md) before implementation. This command MUST run only after /speckit.tasks has successfully produced a complete tasks.md.
Operating Constraints
STRICTLY READ-ONLY: Do not modify any files. Output a structured analysis report. Offer an optional remediation plan (user must explicitly approve before any follow-up editing commands would be invoked manually).
Constitution Authority: The project constitution (.specify/memory/constitution.md) is non-negotiable within this analysis scope. Constitution conflicts are automatically CRITICAL and require adjustment of the spec, plan, or tasks—not dilution, reinterpretation, or silent ignoring of the principle. If a principle itself needs to change, that must occur in a separate, explicit constitution update outside /speckit.analyze.
Execution Steps
1. Initialize Analysis Context
Run .specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasks once from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS. Derive absolute paths:
- SPEC = FEATURE_DIR/spec.md
- PLAN = FEATURE_DIR/plan.md
- TASKS = FEATURE_DIR/tasks.md
Abort with an error message if any required file is missing (instruct the user to run missing prerequisite command). For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
2. Load Artifacts (Progressive Disclosure)
Load only the minimal necessary context from each artifact:
From spec.md:
- Overview/Context
- Functional Requirements
- Success Criteria (measurable outcomes — e.g., performance, security, availability, user success, business impact)
- User Stories
- Edge Cases (if present)
From plan.md:
- Architecture/stack choices
- Data Model references
- Phases
- Technical constraints
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 191 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 3825178a4588
speckit-analyze is a skill published in the GitHub repository traverse-framework/traverse (93 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 1,662 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 81% identical to speckit-analyze, differing in 72 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
superplane-changelog
When generating a SuperPlane changelog from merged commits. Use for "what's new" summaries with new integrations, new components/triggers, improvements, security updates, and bug fixes. Output is user-focused markdown in tmp/.
commit-and-pr-messages
Write Git commit messages and pull request titles/descriptions using the Chris Beams / Tim Pope conventions (subject/body split, 50-char subject, imperative mood, why-not-how body) plus ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English for bodies and PR descriptions. Use when creating commits, drafting or editing PR…
simplified-technical-english
Write user-facing and reviewer-facing technical text in ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English style. Use when drafting PR descriptions, commit message bodies, UI copy, docs, error messages, procedures, onboarding text, or any product wording that must stay clear for non-native readers.
obsidian-writer
Write well-formatted notes to the atmosphere-vault Obsidian knowledge base. Use this skill whenever creating or updating an ADR, runbook, plan, API doc, guide, session output, or any structured document that should land in the vault — even when the user doesn't say "Obsidian" explicitly. Delegates to…
obsidian-vault-setup
Use when setting up the shared atmosphere-vault Obsidian vault on a new machine or for a new team member. Guides through cloning, symlinking claudedocs, and verifying obsidian-cli.
llm-judge
AI quality judge that scores agent responses 0-10 across helpfulness, accuracy, completeness, and clarity. Use when evaluating multi-agent output or implementing LLM-as-judge quality gates.