Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pierreb-devkit/Node --skill verifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pierreb-devkit/NodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pierreb-devkit/node/verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pierreb-devkit/node/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pierreb-devkit/node/verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pierreb-devkit/node/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pierreb-devkit/node/verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00091 | $0.00548 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00036 | $0.00219 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00110 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago Changed · +1 lines ecdece152710
- 1mo ago First seen · 41 lines · 91 tokens per session scan A 420ee6e25e65
verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository pierreb-devkit/Node (20 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 91 tokens to every session and 548 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
endpoint-probe
Probes each major Agent Monitor API route — /api/stats, /api/analytics, /api/sessions, /api/pricing/cost, /api/workflows/runs, /api/cc-config/overview — and reports each one's HTTP status, latency, and response shape, flagging which are reachable. Use to verify a dashboard install is wired up correctly.
pull-request
Use this whenever the user asks to "open a PR", "ship this", "create the pull request", "make a PR", or once a Vue feature/fix is verified and ready to push. Full lifecycle: branch → commit (commitizen) → issue → draft PR → CI → ready → autonomous monitor loop (fix comments, resolve threads, iterate until CI green +…
verify
Run this after every code change in this Vue project, before committing, before opening a PR, or whenever the user says "verify", "check", "lint", "run tests", "build", "audit". Diff audit (router guards, store boundaries, UX, /ui consistency, error handling) → lint → tests + coverage gate → build. Coverage drops →…
security-review
Security Code Review: Reviews code for security vulnerabilities including authentication (OAuth2, JWT), authorization (RBAC, roles), API security, data protection, payment security, and common attack vectors. Use whenever the user wants a security review, penetration test analysis, threat model, or mentions OAuth2…
adk-go-self-review
Review an ADK Go change the way a maintainer will — a fresh-context pass over the whole diff, five lenses (correctness and tests, scope, simplicity, style, adk-python parity), and the mutation check that proves your tests pin the change. Use before opening a PR, before any later push that changes code, and when asked…
adversarial-reviewer
Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general improvement suggestions.