Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pierreb-devkit/Vue --skill pull-requestgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pierreb-devkit/VueWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pierreb-devkit/vue/pull-request)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pierreb-devkit/vue/pull-request"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pierreb-devkit/vue/pull-request/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pierreb-devkit/vue/pull-request"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pierreb-devkit/vue/pull-request.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00114 | $0.01858 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00046 | $0.00743 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00372 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00186 |
Grade A, and why
pull-request scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 187 lines · 114 tokens per session scan A 8ecfefbde69e
pull-request is a skill published in the GitHub repository pierreb-devkit/Vue (20 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 114 tokens to every session and 1,858 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pull-request
Use this whenever the user asks to "open a PR", "ship this", "create the pull request", "make a PR", or once a feature/fix is verified and ready to push. Full lifecycle: branch → commit (commitizen) → issue → draft PR → CI → ready → autonomous monitor loop (fix comments, resolve threads, iterate until CI green + zero…
github-workflow
A GitHub collaboration guide for managing pull requests, issues, automated checks, code reviews, and files in remote repositories.
trace-scan
Trace scan (§4.1/§4.2): before a commit, scans the staged changes and the message for AI traces (co-author trailers, footers, robot emoji, tool names) and vendor template names. The git hooks apply it automatically.
css-refactor-advisor
Analyze a given style file or component directory, identify redundancy, inefficiency, and maintainability issues, and suggest optimizations.
code-review
Perform an in-depth code review of changed files and produce a structured report. Defaults to reviewing staged changes.
update-stack
Use this whenever a downstream Node project needs to absorb upstream Devkit Node changes — triggers on "update stack", "sync with devkit", "merge upstream", "pull stack updates", "resolve stack conflicts". Two-phase: ISO merge (stack modules + lib stay byte-identical to upstream) then project alignment (apply…