Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to pingidentity/aic-mcp-server. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pingidentity/aic-mcp-server/main/.claude/skills/testing/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pingidentity/aic-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pingidentity/aic-mcp-server/testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pingidentity/aic-mcp-server/testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pingidentity/aic-mcp-server/testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pingidentity/aic-mcp-server/testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pingidentity/aic-mcp-server/testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00558 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00223 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 66 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Testing
Framework: Vitest + MSW (Mock Service Worker). Tests mirror source structure under test/tools/<category>/.
Core principle: Test our application logic (request construction, response processing, input validation, error handling), not the API itself.
Test File Template
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';
import { myNewToolTool } from '../../../src/tools/category/myNewTool.js';
import { snapshotTest } from '../../helpers/snapshotTest.js';
import { setupTestEnvironment } from '../../helpers/testEnvironment.js';
import { server } from '../../setup.js';
import { http, HttpResponse } from 'msw';
describe('myNewTool', () => {
const getSpy = setupTestEnvironment(); // Sets AIC_BASE_URL, spies on makeAuthenticatedRequest
// 1. Snapshot test (required for every tool)
it('should match tool schema snapshot', async () => {
await snapshotTest('myNewTool', myNewToolTool);
});
// 2. Request construction — verify URL, scopes, method, body via spy
describe('Request Construction', () => {
it('constructs correct URL', async () => {
await myNewToolTool.toolFunction({ param1: 'value' });
const [url, scopes, options] = getSpy().mock.calls.at(-1)!;
expect(url).toBe('https://test.forgeblocks.com/your/api/endpoint');
expect(scopes).toEqual(['fr:idm:*']);
});
});
// 3. Response handling — use server.use() to provide MSW responses
// 4. Input validation — test Zod schemas directly
// 5. Error handling — override handlers with error responses
});
Section Ordering
- Snapshot Test
- Request Construction
- Response Handling
- Input Validation
- Error Handling
Complex orchestration tools add "Application Logic" after snapshot tests.
Security Tests
Always include for tools that accept user input:
- Path traversal prevention for ID parameters (
schema.parse('../etc/passwd')should throw) - Query injection prevention for user-provided filter strings
After Adding a Tool
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 66 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 270d62e57226
testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository pingidentity/aic-mcp-server (2 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 558 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
cua-driver
Use Cua Driver for desktop or browser tasks that are awkward or unavailable through Bash/APIs, or when the user explicitly wants GUI interaction: app testing, visual bug reproduction, form filling, calendar entry, screenshots, and demo recording. Also covers Cua setup; not OpenAI Codex Computer Use or web research.
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.