Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/pingidentity/aic-mcp-server/testingnpx skills add pingidentity/aic-mcp-server --skill testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pingidentity/aic-mcp-serverWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00061 | $0.00558 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00279 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 66 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Testing
Framework: Vitest + MSW (Mock Service Worker). Tests mirror source structure under test/tools/<category>/.
Core principle: Test our application logic (request construction, response processing, input validation, error handling), not the API itself.
Test File Template
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';
import { myNewToolTool } from '../../../src/tools/category/myNewTool.js';
import { snapshotTest } from '../../helpers/snapshotTest.js';
import { setupTestEnvironment } from '../../helpers/testEnvironment.js';
import { server } from '../../setup.js';
import { http, HttpResponse } from 'msw';
describe('myNewTool', () => {
const getSpy = setupTestEnvironment(); // Sets AIC_BASE_URL, spies on makeAuthenticatedRequest
// 1. Snapshot test (required for every tool)
it('should match tool schema snapshot', async () => {
await snapshotTest('myNewTool', myNewToolTool);
});
// 2. Request construction — verify URL, scopes, method, body via spy
describe('Request Construction', () => {
it('constructs correct URL', async () => {
await myNewToolTool.toolFunction({ param1: 'value' });
const [url, scopes, options] = getSpy().mock.calls.at(-1)!;
expect(url).toBe('https://test.forgeblocks.com/your/api/endpoint');
expect(scopes).toEqual(['fr:idm:*']);
});
});
// 3. Response handling — use server.use() to provide MSW responses
// 4. Input validation — test Zod schemas directly
// 5. Error handling — override handlers with error responses
});
Section Ordering
- Snapshot Test
- Request Construction
- Response Handling
- Input Validation
- Error Handling
Complex orchestration tools add "Application Logic" after snapshot tests.
Security Tests
Always include for tools that accept user input:
- Path traversal prevention for ID parameters (
schema.parse('../etc/passwd')should throw) - Query injection prevention for user-provided filter strings
After Adding a Tool
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 66 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 270d62e57226
testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository pingidentity/aic-mcp-server (2 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 558 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…