RIPDPI: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/openspec-propose/SKILL.md

openspec-propose is a skill for Claude Code from po4yka/RIPDPI. It costs 47 tokens per session (2,382 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of openspec-ff-change, BSD-3-Clause.

A workflow that creates a complete proposal for a software change, including its design, requirements, and implementation tasks, without changing project code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to turn a feature request into a proposal, specifications, design notes, and task list.
Why use it?
It separates deciding what to build from implementing it, so the plan can be reviewed before coding begins.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents); mentions Codex; $skill-name invocation.

This is po4yka/RIPDPI's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on RIPDPI itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything RIPDPI configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to po4yka/RIPDPI. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/po4yka/RIPDPI/main/.agents/skills/openspec-propose/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/po4yka/RIPDPI

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for openspec-propose

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/po4yka/ripdpi/openspec-propose/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/po4yka/ripdpi/openspec-propose)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/po4yka/ripdpi/openspec-propose"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/po4yka/ripdpi/openspec-propose/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for openspec-propose

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/po4yka/ripdpi/openspec-propose"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/po4yka/ripdpi/openspec-propose.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 47 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,382 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 83% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00047 $0.02382
Opus 5.5 $0.00019 $0.00953
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00476
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00238

Measured yesterday against content hash e0bb5e3afc29, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

openspec-propose scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

83% identical to openspec-ff-change — 101 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.agents/skills/openspec-propose/SKILL.md · 152 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 152 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

RIPDPI policy: use only the local repository planning home. OpenSpec stores, global configuration changes, direct archive, and telemetry are out of scope; ./taskctl enforces the pinned tool and disables telemetry.

Propose a new change - create the change and generate all artifacts in one step.

Planning boundary: This workflow creates planning artifacts only. The user request that selected or triggered this workflow authorizes planning only, even if it asks to build or fix something. Do not edit project code. After the planning artifacts are complete, stop. Do not start implementation in the same response, even if the initial request asks for it. Wait for a new user request after the artifacts are presented; then start the apply workflow.

I'll create a change with the artifacts your schema defines. With the default spec-driven schema that is:

  • proposal.md (what & why)
  • specs/<capability-path>/spec.md (what the system must do - a delta, not the main spec)
  • design.md (how)
  • tasks.md (implementation steps)

<capability-path> is the spec directory relative to specs/ (for example, user-auth or identity/user-auth). Preserve an existing capability's full path and follow the project's established organization for new capabilities.

When the user is ready to implement, they must start the apply workflow explicitly.


Repository root: Work only in the current RIPDPI checkout. Do not select or register OpenSpec stores. Run every CLI lookup through ./taskctl openspec cli from the repository root.

Input: The user's request should include a change name (kebab-case) OR a description of what they want to build.

Steps

  1. Understand the request and clarify material ambiguity

    If no clear input is provided, ask the user (open-ended, no preset options):

    "What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."

    From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" → add-user-auth).

    IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.

    If the request contains ambiguity that would materially affect scope, externally observable behavior, compatibility, or acceptance criteria, ask the user before creating the change. For minor details, make a reasonable assumption and record it in the planning artifacts.

  2. Determine the workflow schema

    Use the configured default schema unless the user explicitly requests a different workflow.

    Use a different schema only if the user:

    • Explicitly requests a specific schema by name → use --schema <schema-name>
    • Asks to "show workflows" or asks "what workflows" exist → resolve the authoritative root by running ./taskctl openspec cli context --json from the current working directory. If the user explicitly selected a registered store, use ./taskctl openspec cli context --json --store "<store-id>". Then run ./taskctl openspec cli schemas --json with its working directory set to the returned root.path and let them choose. This preserves roots selected by a local store: pointer or the global defaultStore; schemas does not accept --store. If context reports only no_openspec_root, run ./taskctl openspec cli schemas --json from the current working directory instead. Do not use this fallback for invalid or unavailable stores.

    Otherwise, omit --schema to preserve the configured default.

  3. Create the change directory

    Choose one schema form below. If a registered store is selected, append --store "<store-id>" to that command and each later OpenSpec command shown below that accepts --store.

    Using the configured default:

    ./taskctl openspec cli new change "<name>"
    

    Using an explicitly requested schema:

    ./taskctl openspec cli new change "<name>" --schema "<schema-name>"
    

    This creates a scaffolded change in the planning home resolved by the CLI with .openspec.yaml.

  4. Get the artifact build order

    ./taskctl openspec cli status --change "<name>" --json
    

    Parse the JSON to get:

    • applyRequires: array of artifact IDs needed before implementation (e.g., ["tasks"])
    • artifacts: list of all artifacts, each with its status and its requires edges (the artifact IDs it directly depends on)
    • planningHome, changeRoot, artifactPaths, and actionContext: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.

Read the full file on GitHub · 152 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 152 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A e0bb5e3afc29

Subscribe to this mod's changes

openspec-propose is a skill published in the GitHub repository po4yka/RIPDPI (85 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed BSD-3-Clause. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 2,382 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 83% identical to openspec-ff-change, differing in 101 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

openspec-propose compared with skills from other repositories

openspec-propose next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
openspec-proposepo4yka/RIPDPISkill85yesterdayBSD-3-ClauseA47Claude Code
cindy-plugin-creatormakecindy/cindySkill9.5ktodayApache-2.0A48Codex
argent-react-native-app-workflowsoftware-mansion/argentSkill3.2ktodayApache-2.0A46Claude Code, Codex
engineer-bot-opsmakecindy/cindySkill9.5ktodayApache-2.0A57Claude Code, Codex
apple-search-ads-review-evidencemakecindy/cindySkill9.5ktodayApache-2.0A59Claude Code, Codex
seo-aeo-desk-evidencemakecindy/cindySkill9.5ktodayApache-2.0A43Claude Code, Codex
argent-tv-interactsoftware-mansion/argentSkill3.2ktodayApache-2.0A107Claude Code, Codex