Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add PollyGlot/google-play-cli-skills --skill gplay-compliancegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PollyGlot/google-play-cli-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pollyglot/google-play-cli-skills/gplay-compliance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pollyglot/google-play-cli-skills/gplay-compliance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pollyglot/google-play-cli-skills/gplay-compliance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pollyglot/google-play-cli-skills/gplay-compliance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pollyglot/google-play-cli-skills/gplay-compliance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00345 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00138 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00069 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
gplay-compliance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
gplay compliance (Data Safety)
Manage the app's Data Safety declaration from a canonical CSV. Shared
conventions are in gplay-cli-usage.
Only Data Safety has an API
Content rating (IARC), target audience/Families, ads, news-app, government-app and the other declarations stay manual in Play Console: list them as a manual step in the release runbook.
Data Safety is write-only
The declaration is write-only (ADR-0014): a direct POST outside the
Edits model that replaces the whole document. gplay cannot read it back;
there is no get, only set and an offline validate. validate passing
means well-formed, not accepted: only the live set POST arbitrates against
Google's schema.
gplay compliance datasafety validate # offline structural check, no auth
gplay compliance datasafety set --dry-run # rehearse: validate + resolve target + size, no HTTP
gplay compliance datasafety set --confirm # the real write, replaces the live declaration
CI shape
gplay compliance datasafety validate || exit $? # offline gate, fails on bad CSV
gplay compliance datasafety set --confirm --output json # publish from versioned CSV
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -20 lines · -2 tokens per session d430ece34fbb
- 2mo ago First seen · 57 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A c6e85a36b2e9
gplay-compliance is a skill published in the GitHub repository PollyGlot/google-play-cli-skills (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 345 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
gplay-compliance compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gplay-compliancePollyGlot/google-play-cli-skills | Skill | 5 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 53 | Claude Code, Codex |
| app-store-preflight-complianceRevylAI/greenlight | Skill | 2.5k | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 65 | Claude Code, Codex |
| privacy-policyThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open | Skill | 99 | 25d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 59 | Claude Code, Codex |
| gps-complianceappeeky/google-play-console-cli | Skill | 40 | 17d ago | MIT | A | 37 | Claude Code, Codex |
| store-compliance-prokelvinkosbab/AppBootstrapAI | Skill | 8 | yesterday | MIT | A | 117 | Claude Code |
| compose-ui-builderyschimke/skills | Skill | 2 | 3d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 72 | Claude Code, Codex |
| app-store-compliancemjmirza/app-store-compliance | Skill | 403 | yesterday | none | A | 108 | Claude Code, Codex |