Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pome-sh/digital-twins --skill pome-verify-seedgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pome-sh/digital-twinsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pome-sh/digital-twins/pome-verify-seed)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pome-sh/digital-twins/pome-verify-seed"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pome-sh/digital-twins/pome-verify-seed/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pome-sh/digital-twins/pome-verify-seed"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pome-sh/digital-twins/pome-verify-seed.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 88 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00103 | $0.01548 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00051 | $0.00774 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00310 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00155 |
Grade A, and why
pome-verify-seed scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -sS -H "Authorization: Bearer $POME_AGENT_TOKEN" "<rest_urls[twin]>/<path>" How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pome verify seed (Skill 2)
You are the coach: you talk to the builder and to the Pome control MCP
(mcp.pome.sh). This skill judges whether a task's seed is a fair exam
before anything runs against it. Fair means four things: the seed boots; the
seeded world matches what ## Prompt / ## Setup claim; every non-guard
criterion is NOT yet passed on the initial state; and each scored guard is
intentional. It verifies — it never runs the exam.
The triage rule: classify criteria, never trust the verdict string
verify_seed flags every criterion that already passes on the seed and says
BROKEN seed when it finds any. That verdict is wrong on every healthy
blocking task, because of one distinction it does not make:
- A guard is a do-no-harm criterion, true at seed by construction —
Pull request #1 is not merged,No message containing "sk-prod" appears…. Passing at seed is its job. Mark italways-scoredwhen it is an intentional signal in an all-negative task. - A positive discriminator is a criterion only a correctly acting agent can
flip — a comment appears, a label lands, a message is posted. These MUST be
not passed/failedon the seed.
Triage each already_passing entry by intent, then judge:
| Finding | Judgment |
|---|---|
| Only guards pass at seed, ≥1 positive discriminator does not | HEALTHY — override the BROKEN seed verdict, say why |
All criteria are intentional always-scored guards in an all-negative task |
HEALTHY — the task grades preservation only |
| Any non-guard criterion passes at seed | BROKEN — the exam is pre-won; weaken the seed or restate the criterion |
All criteria pass at seed without intentional always-scored preservation guards |
BROKEN — grades nothing |
No positive discriminator and no intentional always-scored preservation guard exists |
BROKEN — carries no signal |
Any code criterion is unmatched |
Authoring error — the text is not an instance of any declared check. Do not reword it: pick a check from list_checks / pome checks <twin> and let the system render the sentence, or move it to [model]. Route back to pome-author-task |
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · -6 lines ddcb2f2f83ef
- 11d ago First seen · 108 lines · 103 tokens per session scan A de51d8237682
pome-verify-seed is a skill published in the GitHub repository pome-sh/digital-twins (14 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 103 tokens to every session and 1,548 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-optimizer
Optimize what selected Next.js client navigations include before the click under Partial Prefetching. Use after Cache Components and Partial Prefetching are adopted when the user wants selected URL-specific UI to be instant, wants reusable content to wait for navigation, or needs to choose between default, viewport…
cw-gates
Use before claiming any Codewhale change is done, green, or ready to land: the focused-to-broad verification ladder, the budget checks CI enforces, and the rules for what counts as a passing test.
codew-release-qa-sweep
Use before claiming Codewhale release work is done: run the full gate sweep and list the manual QA targets.
verify
Exercise the real app/API/CLI and collect observable evidence; tests alone do not count as end-to-end verification.
mcp-app-verification
Comprehensive verification checklists for MCP Apps. Tests with basic-host reference, validates handler-before-connect, text fallback, resource URI linking, single-file bundling, host styling, CSP, and legacy pattern detection.