Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add PostOakLabs/ainumbers --skill liquidity-stress-morninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PostOakLabs/ainumbersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/postoaklabs/ainumbers/liquidity-stress-morning)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/postoaklabs/ainumbers/liquidity-stress-morning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/postoaklabs/ainumbers/liquidity-stress-morning/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/postoaklabs/ainumbers/liquidity-stress-morning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/postoaklabs/ainumbers/liquidity-stress-morning.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.00629 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00252 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00126 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
liquidity-stress-morning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Liquidity stress morning
Run LCR/NSFR stress, then Basel RWA scenarios, then VaR, and bind it all in one session receipt.
Prompt
One morning risk run, every number re-verifiable.
- Call run_liquidity_stress_test on a synthetic balance sheet under a combined LCR/NSFR stress (outflow rates up, inflows haircuts). Record the survival horizon and the binding constraint.
- Call compute_stress_test_scenarios for the scenario set. Record which scenario is worst and by how much.
- Call compute_rwa_scenarios across the Basel RWA approaches for the same book. Record the RWA range and the approach that binds.
- Call compute_portfolio_var for the trading book at 99/1-day, then under the worst stress path. Record both numbers.
- Consistency check: state in one sentence whether the VaR book and the RWA book overlap, and where the models disagree.
- build_session_receipt over the four runs. Give me the ledger link.
- Write the morning note for the ALCO: the binding constraint, the worst scenario, the RWA and VaR numbers, and the ledger link, so any attendee recomputes the run from the same inputs without your help. Call shape: every ChainGraph node tool takes its arguments nested under one wrapper object, e.g. {"policy_parameters": { ... }}; flat arguments are discarded by schema validation. If a named tool is not in your tool list, call call_tool with { "name": "", "arguments": { … } }. It runs the same validation and returns the same receipt. GPU note: the compute_portfolio_var tool computes in your browser, so the MCP endpoint returns no execution_hash; export the Policy Mandate artifact the page produces and pass that full artifact to verify_execution_hash as claimed_hash.
How to run
Connect an MCP-capable host to https://mcp.ainumbers.co/mcp, then give the prompt above to the assistant.
Use synthetic inputs only. Never paste personal or production data.
Verify what came back
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 15d ago Changed df71551ebe6b
- 19d ago First seen · 41 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A fe267c0c570a
liquidity-stress-morning is a skill published in the GitHub repository PostOakLabs/ainumbers (11 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 629 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-27.
Other skills, from other repositories
risk-assessment
Deterministic heuristic risk scoring using a four-factor weighted model (Geographic 30%, Customer 35%, Product 25%, Channel 10%) aligned with Basel III, EBA Guidelines, FATF standards, and FinCEN guidance. Bands: LOW (0-20), MEDIUM (21-60), HIGH (61-80), CRITICAL (81-100).
transaction-monitoring
AML transaction monitoring for ongoing customer relationships. Identifies suspicious patterns including structuring, layering, and unusual activity. Assesses against regulatory thresholds and prepares Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) with HITL decision gates.
japan-bav-und-corporate-pension-iorp
Japanisches betriebliches Altersversorgungssystem und IORP-Vergleich für europaeische Konzerne. Normen: IORP-II, japanisches Pensionsrecht DB-Pensions-Act. Prüfraster: Leistungsunterschiede, Finanzierungsanforderungen, Konvergenz. Output: Vergleichsanalyse Japan-bAV vs. EU-IORP. Abgrenzung: nicht Expatriate-Planung.
au-tax-research-ryanduguid
Use when researching an Australian tax question for a file note or draft advice: frame the question, verify each primary source and its status for the period, record alternative views and write a review-ready research file note.
regulatory-inquiry-response-bond
A Chinese-language writing assistant for responding to regulatory questions about bonds, which are debt investments issued by organisations.
steuer-at-clemensjl
Use when building or reviewing anything that issues invoices, receipts, or tax records for an Austrian business — invoice generation, receipt printing, cash register or POS integration, VAT rate tables, checkout tax logic, cross-border digital sales, accounting exports — or when asked whether an Austrian invoice or…