Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills --skill dotnet-metalintgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/dotnet-metalint)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/dotnet-metalint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/dotnet-metalint/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/dotnet-metalint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/dotnet-metalint.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.01099 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00549 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00220 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00110 |
Grade A, and why
dotnet-metalint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 104 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Metalint for Aggregated Frontend Linting in .NET Repositories
Trigger On
- the repo wants one command to run several frontend linters together
- the user asks for a unified lint entrypoint over ESLint, Stylelint, HTMLHint, or similar tools
- the repo already has multiple linters and the problem is orchestration rather than choosing a single owner
Do Not Use For
- simple repos where one tool such as Biome already covers the required surface
- teams that have not decided which underlying linters own JS, CSS, and HTML yet
- replacing the underlying linter configs with one vague wrapper config
Inputs
- the nearest
AGENTS.md package.json- existing linter configs
- any
.metalint/directory already checked in
Workflow
- Define underlying ownership first:
- ESLint for JS or TS
- Stylelint for CSS or SCSS
- HTMLHint for static HTML
- other delegated linters only when the repo really uses them
- Use Metalint only after those owners are explicit.
- Keep all wrapper configuration under
.metalint/and keep the delegated configs reviewable. - Add package scripts such as:
lint:metalintlint:fix:metalint --fix
- Treat formatter overlap carefully. If delegated tools can all fix files, define which ones are allowed to mutate which globs.
- Use Metalint in CI when the repo benefits from a single frontend lint step and formatter output such as GitHub annotations.
- Re-run the underlying owners directly when debugging Metalint issues so failures stay attributable.
Bootstrap When Missing
- Detect current state:
rg --files -g 'package.json' -g '.metalint/**' -g 'eslint.config.*' -g 'stylelint.config.*' -g '.htmlhintrc*'rg -n '"metalint"|"eslint"|"stylelint"|"htmlhint"' --glob 'package.json' .
- Prefer a repo-local install:
npm install --save-dev metalint
- Install the delegated linters the repo actually needs; Metalint does not replace them.
- Create
.metalint/metalint.config.jsplus delegated config files under.metalint/only when the repo wants that consolidated layout. - Verify with:
npx metalintnpx metalint --fix
- Return
status: configuredif the repo now has a working aggregated entrypoint, orstatus: improvedif orchestration was tightened. - Return
status: not_applicablewhen the repo intentionally stays with direct linter commands and does not want the wrapper layer.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 104 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A c4954d27074c
dotnet-metalint is a skill published in the GitHub repository Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills (10 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 1,099 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
frontend-ai-guide
Applies React/TypeScript-specific technical decision criteria, anti-pattern detection, debugging, and frontend quality gates. Use when reviewing components, hooks, browser behavior, or frontend implementation completeness.
recipe-front-design
Execute from repository evidence through applicable UI Spec and optional ADR decisions to complete frontend Design Doc approval.
recipe-front-review
Reviews completed frontend implementation for governing-source compliance, scope economy, repository quality, and security, then applies user-approved React corrections.
recipe-front-adjust
Adjust an already-implemented UI in-session with verification against the design source.
recipe-fullstack-implement
Orchestrate full-cycle implementation across backend and frontend layers.
recipe-front-plan
Create frontend work plan from design document and obtain plan approval.