noodle: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/quality/SKILL.md

quality is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from poteto/noodle. It costs 53 tokens per session (692 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A post-work review process, also called a quality gate, that checks completed coding work against its plan, tests, project rules, and scope. It reports problems after implementation stages finish.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a completed change, run the project's Go checks and tests, inspect the files changed, and assess whether the implementation follows project guidance.
Why use it?
It catches incorrect code, missing verification, unnecessary changes, and violations of project principles before the work is accepted.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents); mentions Codex.

This is poteto/noodle's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on noodle itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything noodle configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to poteto/noodle. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/poteto/noodle/main/.agents/skills/quality/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/poteto/noodle

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for quality

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/poteto/noodle/quality/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/poteto/noodle/quality)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/poteto/noodle/quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/poteto/noodle/quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for quality

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/poteto/noodle/quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/poteto/noodle/quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 53 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 692 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00053 $0.00692
Opus 5.5 $0.00021 $0.00277
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00138
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00069

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 89af8637035b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/quality/SKILL.md · 79 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Quality

Review completed cook work. Emit a stage_message event with your assessment. See references/stage-message-schema.md for the event schema.

Operate fully autonomously. Never ask the user.

Step 0 -- Load Principles

Read brain/principles.md and follow every [[wikilink]]. These govern the review. Do NOT skip this.

Assessment Pipeline

Run in order. Stop early and reject on any high-severity finding.

1. Scope Check

  • Read the plan phase the cook was assigned (from the cook's initial prompt or mise context).
  • Run git diff --stat and git log --oneline for the cook's commits.
  • Flag files changed outside the plan phase's stated scope as scope violations.

2. Code Quality

  • go vet ./... and go test ./... must pass.
  • Run sh scripts/lint-arch.sh if it exists.
  • Check error handling follows project conventions (failure-state messages, not expectation messages).

3. Principle Compliance

  • For each changed file, check against loaded principles.
  • Common violations: bolted-on changes instead of redesign (redesign-from-first-principles), missing verification (prove-it-works), unnecessarily added complexity (subtract-before-you-add).

4. Test Evidence

  • New behavior must have new tests.
  • Tests must assert outcomes, not implementation details.
  • Check coverage of edge cases mentioned in the plan phase.

5. Runtime Verification

  • If the plan phase specifies runtime checks, verify they were performed.
  • "It compiles" is not verification.

Verdict

Emit a stage_message event with your assessment:

noodle event emit --session $NOODLE_SESSION_ID stage_message --payload '<json>'

Accept: Emit with blocking: false. The pipeline continues and the scheduler sees the green light.

{ "message": "All checks pass. Tests green, scope clean.", "blocking": false }

Reject: Emit with blocking: true (or omit blocking). The scheduler reads findings and decides (retry, add oops stage, or abort).

Read the full file on GitHub · 79 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 79 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 89af8637035b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository poteto/noodle (529 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 692 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens