Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ppak10/rocketsmith/stability-analysisnpx skills add ppak10/RocketSmith --skill stability-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ppak10/RocketSmithWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ppak10/rocketsmith/stability-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ppak10/rocketsmith/stability-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ppak10/rocketsmith/stability-analysis.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00030 | $0.01111 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00556 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00222 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
stability-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Stability Analysis
Overview
Stability margin = (CP − CG) / reference diameter, measured in calibers. The target is 1.0–1.5 cal. Outside this range the rocket is either dangerous or excessively weathercock-sensitive.
Core principle: Always fix the root cause — geometry or mass distribution — not the symptom. Never accept a null stability result; compute it manually.
When to Use
min_stability_cal< 1.0 (unstable)min_stability_cal> 1.5 (over-stable)min_stability_calisnullafter simulation- User reports unexpected flight path or weathercocking
- Stability was in range before
rocketsmith:mass-calibrationbut fell out after applying real printed part weights — this is the expected failure mode when printed PLA/PETG is significantly heavier than OpenRocket's material defaults
Steps
1. Read the Numbers
Run openrocket_component (action="read") and note:
cg_x— center of gravity from nose tip (m)cp_x— center of pressure from nose tip (m)max_diameter_m— reference diameter
If min_stability_cal returned null, compute manually:
stability_cal = (cp_x - cg_x) / max_diameter_m
A positive result means CP is aft of CG — stable. A negative or zero result means unstable.
1.5. Consult the Reference Collection
Query rag_reference(action="search", collection="stability_notes", query=f"stability {round(current_cal, 2)} cal {symptom}", n_results=3) for prior cases with known fixes. Cite close matches and weigh against the heuristic below. Proceed if no results or on errors — the collection is an enrichment, not a prerequisite.
2. Diagnose the Direction
Under-stable (< 1.0 cal): CP is too close to CG, or forward of it.
- Fins too small or too far forward
- Nose cone too heavy
- Body tube too short relative to fin span
Over-stable (> 1.5 cal): CP is too far aft of CG.
- Fins too large
- Nose cone too light
- Aft mass (motor, motor mount) dominating
3. Apply Fixes
Work one change at a time. Re-simulate after each.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 105 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A bb4f54c054cc
stability-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository ppak10/RocketSmith (21 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 1,111 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
gws-shared
The gws binary must be on $PATH. See the project README for install options.
gws-sheets
Google Sheets: Read and write spreadsheets.
gws-gmail
Gmail: Send, read, and manage email.
gws-modelarmor
Google Model Armor: Filter user-generated content for safety.
gws-docs
Read and write Google Docs.
persona-project-manager
Coordinate projects — track tasks, schedule meetings, and share docs.