dev-rfc

dev-rfc is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from pproenca/dot-skills. It costs 143 tokens per session (3,480 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide for writing RFCs and technical proposals, which are documents used to agree on a software change before building it. It also covers architecture documents and short proposals for smaller changes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for new system proposals, architecture overviews, design documents, and significant changes to existing software.
Why use it?
It gives teams a clear way to compare approaches, explain decisions, and plan rollout or document how a system works.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md.

Good fit Use it for new system proposals, architecture overviews, design documents, and significant changes to existing software.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/pproenca/dot-skills/dev-rfc
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add pproenca/dot-skills --skill dev-rfc
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pproenca/dot-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for dev-rfc

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pproenca/dot-skills/dev-rfc/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pproenca/dot-skills/dev-rfc)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pproenca/dot-skills/dev-rfc"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pproenca/dot-skills/dev-rfc/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for dev-rfc

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pproenca/dot-skills/dev-rfc"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pproenca/dot-skills/dev-rfc.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 143 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,480 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 223
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00143 $0.03480
Opus 5 $0.00072 $0.01740
Sonnet 5 $0.00029 $0.00696
Haiku 4.5 $0.00014 $0.00348

Measured 6d ago against content hash 790ce9647100, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

dev-rfc scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 5 executable files (assets/marked.min.js, assets/mermaid.min.js, scripts/generate_review.py, …), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

curl -s -X POST http://localhost:3118/api/section/add \
skills/.experimental/dev-rfc/SKILL.md · 277 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 277 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Dev RFC Skill

Write RFCs and technical proposals that serve two purposes: aligning stakeholders on what to build and why (RFCs), and helping engineers understand how a system works (architecture docs). Most real proposals blend both — the skill helps you pick the right sections for the situation.

Reference Templates

Read references/template.md for the three structural templates:

  • RFC — for pre-build alignment. Focuses on abstract, approaches (with fair comparison), service SLAs, observability, and rollout plan.
  • Architecture Doc — for documenting built systems. Focuses on diagrams, source tree, data flow, design philosophy.
  • One-Pager — for small changes (< 1 week). Problem, Proposed Solution, Rollout. ~20 lines.

Step 0: Pick the Mode

Ask the user (or infer from context) which situation they're in:

Situation Mode Key question the doc answers
Planning a new system or major change RFC "Should we build this, and how?"
Documenting an existing system Architecture Doc "How does this system work?"
Proposing a change to an existing system RFC (with before/after diagrams in Detailed Design) "Why are we changing this, and what will it look like?"
Small scoped change (< 1 week) One-Pager "What and why, briefly?"

For changes to existing systems, use the RFC structure as the backbone but include before/after architecture diagrams in the Detailed Design section, with [NEW] and [CHANGED] markers on components.

File Placement

  • Formal proposal or RFCdocs/rfcs/RFC-NNN-title.md as primary location
  • Architecture doc for the whole projectARCHITECTURE.md at the repo root
  • Subsystem docdocs/design/subsystem-name.md or alongside the code it describes

If the user hasn't specified where to put the doc, ask.

Step 1: Understand the Project

Before writing anything, build a mental model.

For RFCs:

  • Clarify the problem statement and constraints with the user
  • Understand who the stakeholders and approvers are
  • Ask about existing systems this interacts with or replaces
  • Identify hard constraints (timeline, budget, compatibility, compliance)
  • Ask what alternatives have already been considered or rejected

Read the full file on GitHub · 277 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 277 lines · 143 tokens per session scan A 790ce9647100

Subscribe to this mod's changes

dev-rfc is a skill published in the GitHub repository pproenca/dot-skills (205 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 143 tokens to every session and 3,480 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens

next-partial-prefetching-adoption

Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…

vercel/next.js · 103 tokens