Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add PramodDutta/qaskills --skill istqb-test-design-techniquesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PramodDutta/qaskillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pramoddutta/qaskills/istqb-test-design-techniques)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pramoddutta/qaskills/istqb-test-design-techniques"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pramoddutta/qaskills/istqb-test-design-techniques/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pramoddutta/qaskills/istqb-test-design-techniques"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pramoddutta/qaskills/istqb-test-design-techniques.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.01658 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00663 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00332 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00166 |
Grade A, and why
ISTQB Test Design Techniques scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 140 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ISTQB Test Design Techniques Skill
You are an expert test analyst trained in ISTQB black-box test design. When the user gives you a requirement, form, API, or state machine and asks for test cases, derive them with these techniques instead of brainstorming randomly.
Core Principles
- Techniques replace guessing. Each technique is an algorithm from requirement to test set; apply them systematically, then add exploratory intuition on top.
- Minimal sets, maximal coverage. The goal is the FEWEST cases that cover every partition, boundary, rule, and transition; more cases is not more quality.
- Name the technique in the test. A case titled "BVA: max order amount upper boundary" is reviewable; "test order amount" is not.
- Invalid partitions are half the work. Most escapes live in rejected-input handling.
- Combine techniques. Partition first, boundaries on numeric partitions, decision tables for rule interactions, state transitions for lifecycles, pairwise for config spreads.
Equivalence Partitioning (EP)
Split inputs into classes where the system should behave identically; test ONE value per class.
Example requirement: discount code field accepts 6-10 alphanumeric characters.
| Partition | Class | Representative |
|---|---|---|
| 6-10 alphanumerics | Valid | SAVE2026 |
| Under 6 chars | Invalid | SAVE |
| Over 10 chars | Invalid | SAVEALOT2026X |
| Non-alphanumeric | Invalid | SAVE-26! |
| Empty | Invalid | "" |
Five cases cover what a random tester hits with twenty. Rule: every input gets valid AND invalid partitions; combine one-invalid-at-a-time so failures attribute cleanly.
Boundary Value Analysis (BVA)
Bugs cluster at edges (off-by-one comparisons). For each numeric/ordered partition, test the boundary and its neighbors.
Requirement: order quantity 1-100.
Two-value BVA: 0, 1, 100, 101. Three-value (stricter): 0, 1, 2 and 99, 100, 101.
// the exact bug class BVA catches
if (quantity > 100) reject(); // dev wrote >, spec said >=? case "100" decides
test.each([[0, 'rejected'], [1, 'accepted'], [100, 'accepted'], [101, 'rejected']])(
'BVA: quantity %i is %s', (qty, outcome) => { /* ... */ });
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 140 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 1f0268c0d84a
ISTQB Test Design Techniques is a skill published in the GitHub repository PramodDutta/qaskills (243 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 1,658 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-design-techniques
Systematic test design with boundary value analysis, equivalence partitioning, decision tables, state transition testing, and combinatorial testing. Use when designing comprehensive test cases, reducing redundant tests, or ensuring systematic coverage.
quality-postmortem
Analyze escaped defects and test suite health through blameless postmortems. Covers bug pattern analysis, test suite health reviews, 5 Whys root cause analysis, process improvement cycles, and postmortem/retro meeting templates with action item tracking. Use when: "QA retro," "escaped bugs," "postmortem," "quality…
shift-left-testing
Move quality earlier in the development lifecycle. Covers dev/QA pairing patterns, Three Amigos sessions, TDD facilitation (Red-Green-Refactor), PR review checklists for testability, and Definition of Done with quality gates. Includes shift-left maturity model for team assessment. Use when: "shift left," "TDD,"…
test-strategy
Produce a multi-quarter QA strategy document. Covers scope, risk-based prioritization, test levels (unit/integration/E2E), pyramid analysis, entry/exit criteria, quality KPIs, tool selection rationale, CI scaling levers, and timeline planning. Output is an actionable strategy document, not a shelf document. Use when…
performance-testing
Test application performance with k6 load/stress/soak/spike scripts and k6 scenarios, Lighthouse CI for Web Vitals, and performance budgets as CI gates. Covers load profiles, custom metrics, bottleneck identification, and Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS). Use when: "performance test," "load test," "stress test," "soak…
test-case-management
Author and maintain MANUAL and hybrid test cases and suites in TestRail, Xray (Jira), Zephyr Scale, and Qase. Covers test-case anatomy (title, preconditions, steps, expected results, test data), suite/section organization, bulk authoring from user stories and acceptance criteria, ambiguous-step linting, CSV/API…