review-implement-phase

review-implement-phase is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from prisma/prisma-next. It costs 38 tokens per session (1,301 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A workflow for carrying out selected actions from a pull-request review plan. It makes code changes, runs relevant checks, commits the fixes, and updates review threads.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps implement approved fixes, test them, create focused Git commits, and mark completed review threads.
Why use it?
It connects review decisions to tracked implementation work so addressed comments do not get lost.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/prisma/prisma-next/review-implement-phase
Any agent
npx skills add prisma/prisma-next --skill review-implement-phase
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/prisma/prisma-next

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-implement-phase

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prisma/prisma-next/review-implement-phase.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/prisma/prisma-next/review-implement-phase)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/prisma/prisma-next/review-implement-phase"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prisma/prisma-next/review-implement-phase.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 38 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,301 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00038 $0.01301
Opus 5 $0.00019 $0.00651
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00260
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00130

Measured yesterday against content hash 176c0b966b8c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-implement-phase scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 4 executable files (scripts/check-github-admin-ready.mjs, scripts/post-review-thread-reply.mjs, scripts/resolve-review-thread.mjs, …), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills-contrib/review-implement-phase/SKILL.md · 114 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 114 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review Implement Phase

Run only the implementation phase of the review-framework loop:

take triaged will_address actions, make code changes, commit in logical steps, post GitHub status updates, and update action status.

Run commands from this skill directory. All script paths below are relative to it.

Inputs

  • Required:
    • PR URL
    • existing review-actions.json in output dir
  • Optional:
    • output directory
    • scope constraints (specific action IDs or files)

If output directory is omitted, derive:

wip/reviews/<owner>_<repo>_pr-<number>/

Preconditions

<output-dir>/review-actions.json must exist and be valid v2.

System dependencies required on PATH:

  • gh (GitHub CLI)

If gh is missing, halt immediately and ask the user to install it. The implement-phase scripts no longer depend on jq.

GitHub admin capability must be available before starting implementation:

node ./scripts/check-github-admin-ready.mjs --pr <PR_URL>

If missing, instruct user to run:

  • /review-fetch-phase <PR_URL> [output-dir]
  • /review-triage-phase <PR_URL> [output-dir]

Behavior

  1. Read actions JSON and select actionable rows:
    • decision: will_address
    • status: pending | in_progress
  2. Preflight GitHub admin capability:
    • run check-github-admin-ready.mjs and fail fast if unavailable
  3. Always post standalone comments (never pending PR reviews):
    • When posting progress updates, do not create a PR review (draft/pending or otherwise).
    • Forbidden flows:
      • gh pr review --comment ...
      • GraphQL addPullRequestReview, addPullRequestReviewComment, addPullRequestReviewThread (this workflow never uses pending reviews)
    • Allowed flows:
      • thread replies via addPullRequestReviewThreadReply (or wrapper script)
      • issue comments via addComment (or wrapper script)
    • Before starting implementation:
      • Detect pending reviews authored by the acting user on this PR.
      • If any exist, halt and clean them up (submit or dismiss) before continuing.
    • After posting any "On it" / "Done" comment:
      • Re-check for pending reviews authored by the acting user.
      • If any exist, the workflow is blocked until they are cleaned up.
    • Implementation requirement:
      • For review_thread targets, always reply using thread replies (never inline PR review comments).
        • If you only have the thread node id, first fetch the thread’s primary comment node id, then call addPullRequestReviewThreadReply.
      • For pull_request_review targets (review-body findings, PRR_… node ids), inline replies are not possible. post-review-thread-reply.mjs auto-detects this and posts a top-level PR issue comment instead (response kind: "issue_comment"); there is no thread to resolve, so the implementer skips resolve-review-thread.mjs for these and records the issue-comment id in the action's done record.
  4. Delegate implementation to:
  • ./agents/review-implementer.md
  1. Require implementer responsibilities:
    • make code changes
    • run relevant checks
    • create focused commits
    • post "On it" when starting each action
    • post "Done" when finished (universal); resolve the thread only when target.kind === "review_thread" and a threadNodeId is available. pull_request_review targets have no inline thread, so the implementer skips the resolve step for them and records the issue-comment id in the action's done record (per behavior step 3).
    • use encoded helper scripts for thread admin operations:
      • node ./scripts/post-review-thread-reply.mjs --repo <owner>/<repo> --pr <number> --comment-node-id <primaryCommentNodeId> --body "<text>" (works for both review_thread and pull_request_review — auto-detects node kind)
      • node ./scripts/resolve-review-thread.mjs --thread-node-id <threadNodeId> (only for review_thread targets)
    • comments must be posted as individual standalone comments/replies, never as part of a pending review
    • after each action completion (Done + resolve when applicable), verify no new pending review was created by the acting user
    • never use inline parser snippets (for example: python -c, node -e, ruby -e, ad-hoc awk/sed JSON parsing)
    • only set status: done after Done (and, for review_thread targets, resolve) succeeds
    • update review-actions.json (status, done.doneAt, done.summary, done.commits) in the same completion step
  2. Render latest action markdown:

Read the full file on GitHub · 114 lines

Files

What ships with it

6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 114 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 176c0b966b8c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-implement-phase is a skill published in the GitHub repository prisma/prisma-next (419 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,301 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

create-pr

Creates a GitHub PR with a Linear-ticket-prefixed title and a decision-led, narrative description for prisma-next. Use when the user wants to create a pull request, open a PR, or submit changes for review.

prisma/orm · 47 tokens

review-implement-phase

Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.

prisma/orm · 38 tokens

review-triage-phase

Produces canonical review actions from fetched review state and renders action markdown. Use when the user wants only triage/action-planning for the review-framework workflow.

prisma/orm · 36 tokens

multiline-commit-messages

Use single-quoted strings for multiline git commit messages in the Shell tool. Prevents heredoc escaping failures that produce garbled commit messages.

prisma/orm · 35 tokens

draft-release-notes

Author the committed release-notes file for a Prisma 8 release (stable or 8.0.0-rc.N) by enumerating the merged PRs since the previous release v tag (stable or -rc.N), resolving opaque TML-NNNN: titles via Linear context (never copied verbatim), triaging public-worthiness, and writing categorized notes — breaking…

prisma/orm · 174 tokens

record-upgrade-instructions

Record upgrade instructions alongside a Prisma Next breaking-change PR, so downstream consumers (users of @internal/ and authors of Prisma Next extensions) can apply the matching code translation automatically via the published upgrade skills. Use when you have refactored framework code and the test suite went red in…

prisma/orm · 120 tokens