Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add product-on-purpose/pm-skills --skill deliver-prdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/product-on-purpose/pm-skills/deliver-prd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/product-on-purpose/pm-skills/deliver-prd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/product-on-purpose/pm-skills/deliver-prd/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/product-on-purpose/pm-skills/deliver-prd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/product-on-purpose/pm-skills/deliver-prd.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 59 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 82 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.01631 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00816 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00326 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00163 |
Grade A, and why
deliver-prd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 107 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Product Requirements Document (PRD)
A Product Requirements Document is the primary specification artifact that communicates what to build and why. It bridges the gap between problem understanding and engineering implementation by providing clear requirements, success criteria, and scope boundaries. A good PRD enables engineering to build the right thing while maintaining flexibility on implementation details.
When to Use
- After problem and solution alignment, before engineering work begins
- When specifying features, epics, or product initiatives for handoff
- When multiple teams need to coordinate on a shared deliverable
- When stakeholders need to approve scope before investment
- As reference documentation during development and QA
When NOT to Use
- The problem is still unframed or contested -> use
define-problem-statementfirst; a PRD assumes an agreed problem - You need a one-page pitch to align stakeholders on an approach -> use
develop-solution-brief; the PRD comes after that alignment - You only need the work broken into tickets for a sprint -> use
deliver-user-stories - You are recording a technical or architectural decision -> use
develop-adr
Instructions
When asked to create a PRD, follow these steps:
-
Summarize the Problem Start with a brief recap of the problem being solved. Link to the problem statement if available. Ensure readers understand why this work matters before diving into what to build.
-
Define Goals and Success Metrics Articulate what success looks like. Include specific, measurable metrics with baselines and targets. These metrics should connect directly to the problem being solved.
-
Outline the Solution Describe the proposed solution at a high level. Focus on user-facing functionality and key capabilities. Include enough detail for stakeholders to evaluate the approach without over-specifying implementation.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 107 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 2b48e0af712d
deliver-prd is a skill published in the GitHub repository product-on-purpose/pm-skills (663 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 1,631 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
status-update-writer
Use when the user asks to write a status update, weekly or monthly update, stakeholder update, project update, standup, status report, or QBR. Do NOT use for writing a PRD or a retro doc — those need different structures.
stakeholder-update
Translate the same underlying project status into audience-appropriate versions (exec-brief, engineering-detail, customer-facing) without changing the underlying facts. Use when a PM needs to write a status update, especially when the same update needs to go to multiple different audiences. Pairs with…
scope-cut
Decision framework for what to cut when a spec, sprint, or launch is too big for the time or team available. Use whenever a PM says a scope needs to shrink, a deadline is fixed and the work isn't, or someone asks "what can we cut" or "what's the MVP version of this." Also trigger when reviewing a spec that feels…
escalation-judgment
Decision framework for whether a blocker, risk, or conflict is actually worth escalating to leadership versus resolving at the working level. Use when a PM is unsure whether to "loop in" a director/VP, when a team is stuck and someone suggests escalating, or when reviewing whether a past escalation was warranted. Also…
okrs
Use when asked to "set OKRs", "objectives and key results", "quarterly OKR planning", "align objectives", "measure OKR progress", or "focus priorities with OKRs". Helps teams focus on what matters most and create a cadence of progress. The OKR framework (originated by Andy Grove at Intel, popularized by John Doerr at…
shape-up
Use when asked to "shape up", "run a shaping session", "set an appetite", "scope a project without estimates", "betting table", or "ship in fixed cycles". Helps teams escape estimate-driven development and Scrum fatigue. The Shape Up method (created by Ryan Singer at Basecamp/37signals) uses fixed time boxes, variable…