Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ProfFroggo/froggo-mission-control. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ProfFroggo/froggo-mission-control/dev/.claude/skills/code-review-checklist/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ProfFroggo/froggo-mission-controlWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/proffroggo/froggo-mission-control/code-review-checklist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/proffroggo/froggo-mission-control/code-review-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/proffroggo/froggo-mission-control/code-review-checklist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/proffroggo/froggo-mission-control/code-review-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/proffroggo/froggo-mission-control/code-review-checklist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00334 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00134 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00067 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
code-review-checklist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review Checklist
Correctness
- Logic matches stated requirements
- Edge cases handled (empty arrays, null values, network errors)
- No off-by-one errors in loops or pagination
Security
- SQL uses parameterized queries (never string interpolation)
- User input validated before use
- No secrets in code or logs
- API routes don't expose sensitive data
TypeScript
-
npx tsc --noEmitpasses cleanly - No
anyintroduced without clear reason - Async/await used correctly (no floating promises)
Performance
- No N+1 queries (use JOINs)
- Large lists paginated
- Expensive operations not in render loops
Mission Control Specifics
- DB schema changes run via
npx tsx tools/migrate-db.js(never raw sqlite3 CLI) - ENV values imported via
src/lib/env.tsnotprocess.envdirectly - New output files written to
~/mission-control/library/(correct subfolder) - External actions (tweets, emails, deploys) use
approval_createMCP tool
Verdict
- APPROVED: All boxes checked or minor issues noted
- CHANGES_REQUESTED: One or more boxes fail — list specifics
- BLOCKED: Needs architectural decision or human input
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 39 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 4b47713a0213
code-review-checklist is a skill published in the GitHub repository ProfFroggo/froggo-mission-control (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 334 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-07.
code-review-checklist compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| code-review-checklistProfFroggo/froggo-mission-control | Skill | 2 | 6mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 15 | Claude Code |
| autoreviewopenclaw/clawhub | Skill | 9.5k | yesterday | MIT | A | 17 | Claude Code, Codex |
| agent-teams-simplify-and-hardenLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills | Skill | 2.2k | 6d ago | MIT | A | 115 | Claude Code, Codex |
| omh-code-reviewrlaope/oh-my-hermes | Skill | 5.2k | yesterday | MIT | A | 48 | Claude Code, Codex |
| revdiff-planumputun/revdiff | Skill | 945 | yesterday | MIT | A | 84 | Claude Code |
| explore-unknownsdzhng/skills | Skill | 1.4k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 162 | Claude Code, Codex |
| re0-mergeLilMGenius/paperthin | Skill | 1.4k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 70 | Claude Code |