Decepticon is an autonomous red-team agent that coordinates AI agents, security tools, sandboxes, and supporting services for authorized cybersecurity assessments. Security researchers and red teams can run it through its Docker stack, cloud service, command-line interface, or Python SDK, with the catalogue entries representing its available skills.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add PurpleAILAB/Decepticon --skill flash-loangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PurpleAILAB/DecepticonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/purpleailab/decepticon/flash-loan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/purpleailab/decepticon/flash-loan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/purpleailab/decepticon/flash-loan.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.01889 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00945 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00378 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00189 |
Grade A, and why
flash-loan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- flash-loan — 97% identical, 3 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 195 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Flash Loan Attack Playbook
Flash loans give the attacker uncollateralized capital for a single transaction. They're not vulnerabilities themselves — they're a force multiplier for existing bugs. Sources: Aave, Balancer, Uniswap V2/V3, Maker, dYdX (deprecated).
Common attack patterns
1. Oracle amplification (most common)
Use loan to push a price, then trigger price-dependent action.
Cross-reference: see oracle-manipulation/SKILL.md.
2. Unauthenticated callback handler
function executeOperation(
address[] calldata assets,
uint256[] calldata amounts,
uint256[] calldata premiums,
address initiator, // ← UNVALIDATED in many contracts
bytes calldata params
) external returns (bool) {
// Anyone can call this with fake `initiator`
// and have the contract do whatever the params say
}
Bug: initiator and msg.sender == pool checks are missing.
Attack: call executeOperation directly with no actual loan, malicious params → contract does the operation anyway.
3. Governance attack via flash loan
// Vulnerable governance:
function propose() external {
require(getVotes(msg.sender) > THRESHOLD);
// ...
}
function getVotes(address user) public view returns (uint256) {
return token.balanceOf(user); // ← reads SPOT balance, not snapshot
}
Attack: flash-loan governance tokens, propose malicious change (e.g., upgrade contract to drain), vote with the loaned tokens, execute, repay loan. MakerDAO had this pattern; mitigated by checkpoint-based voting.
4. Liquidity manipulation
Pool that uses totalSupply() or balanceOf(pool) for share math:
function deposit(uint256 amt) external {
uint256 shares = (amt * totalSupply()) / underlying.balanceOf(address(this));
_mint(msg.sender, shares);
underlying.transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), amt);
}
Attacker:
- Flash-loan and deposit (becomes 99% of pool)
- Donate underlying to inflate
underlying.balanceOfartificially - Next depositor's shares =
amt * totalSupply / inflatedBalance≈ 0 - Withdraw → drain
This is the ERC4626 inflation attack (also covered in
reentrancy/overlap).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 195 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 21404d715343
flash-loan is a skill published in the GitHub repository PurpleAILAB/Decepticon (5,463 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 1,889 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
langchain-fundamentals
Create LangChain agents with createagent, define tools, and use middleware for human-in-the-loop and error handling.
langsmith-evaluator
INVOKE THIS SKILL when building evaluation pipelines for LangSmith. Covers three core components: (1) Creating Evaluators - LLM-as-Judge, custom code; (2) Defining Run Functions - how to capture outputs and trajectories from your agent; (3) Running Evaluations - locally with evaluate() or auto-run via LangSmith. Uses…
devloop
Goal-driven development loop — define objective, write rules with key-results, verify visually, sync to issue tracker.
interactive-dashboard
Interactive web dashboards: stock trackers, sector heatmaps, portfolio monitors — served via preview URL.
skill0
Root index of x-cmd skill0 sub-skills. Defines the OKR-style agent workflow (goal → rule-verified results → execute), skill discovery, and agent tooling preferences. Style: principle-first, concise, delegate specifics to authoritative external sources.
idea-generation
Stock screening and idea generation: quantitative screens, thematic analysis, shortlist.