flash-loan

flash-loan is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from MingyiSecLab/Mingyi-Atlas. It costs 27 tokens per session (1,870 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of flash-loan, Apache-2.0.

A security-audit guide for flash-loan attacks. A flash loan is a large blockchain loan that must be borrowed and repaid within one transaction, allowing existing contract bugs to be exploited with temporary capital.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review price oracles, callback authorization, flash-loan repayment logic, and voting systems that use current token balances.
Why use it?
Flash loans can greatly increase the scale of price manipulation, callback abuse, and governance attacks without requiring the attacker to own the funds.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review price oracles, callback authorization, flash-loan repayment logic, and voting systems that use current token balances.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/flash-loan
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add MingyiSecLab/Mingyi-Atlas --skill flash-loan
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MingyiSecLab/Mingyi-Atlas

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for flash-loan

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/flash-loan/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/flash-loan)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/flash-loan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/flash-loan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for flash-loan

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/flash-loan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mingyiseclab/mingyi-atlas/flash-loan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 27 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,870 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 97% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00027 $0.01870
Opus 5 $0.00014 $0.00935
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00374
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00187

Measured 8d ago against content hash 81f6c7b1217a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

flash-loan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

97% identical to flash-loan — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

src/skills/standard/contracts/flash-loan/SKILL.md · 192 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 192 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Flash Loan Attack Playbook

Flash loans give the attacker uncollateralized capital for a single transaction. They're not vulnerabilities themselves — they're a force multiplier for existing bugs. Sources: Aave, Balancer, Uniswap V2/V3, Maker, dYdX (deprecated).

Common attack patterns

1. Oracle amplification (most common)

Use loan to push a price, then trigger price-dependent action. Cross-reference: see oracle-manipulation/SKILL.md.

2. Unauthenticated callback handler

function executeOperation(
    address[] calldata assets,
    uint256[] calldata amounts,
    uint256[] calldata premiums,
    address initiator,                     // ← UNVALIDATED in many contracts
    bytes calldata params
) external returns (bool) {
    // Anyone can call this with fake `initiator`
    // and have the contract do whatever the params say
}

Bug: initiator and msg.sender == pool checks are missing. Attack: call executeOperation directly with no actual loan, malicious params → contract does the operation anyway.

3. Governance attack via flash loan

// Vulnerable governance:
function propose() external {
    require(getVotes(msg.sender) > THRESHOLD);
    // ...
}
function getVotes(address user) public view returns (uint256) {
    return token.balanceOf(user);  // ← reads SPOT balance, not snapshot
}

Attack: flash-loan governance tokens, propose malicious change (e.g., upgrade contract to drain), vote with the loaned tokens, execute, repay loan. MakerDAO had this pattern; mitigated by checkpoint-based voting.

4. Liquidity manipulation

Pool that uses totalSupply() or balanceOf(pool) for share math:

function deposit(uint256 amt) external {
    uint256 shares = (amt * totalSupply()) / underlying.balanceOf(address(this));
    _mint(msg.sender, shares);
    underlying.transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), amt);
}

Attacker:

  1. Flash-loan and deposit (becomes 99% of pool)
  2. Donate underlying to inflate underlying.balanceOf artificially
  3. Next depositor's shares = amt * totalSupply / inflatedBalance ≈ 0
  4. Withdraw → drain This is the ERC4626 inflation attack (also covered in reentrancy/ overlap).

Read the full file on GitHub · 192 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 192 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 81f6c7b1217a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

flash-loan is a skill published in the GitHub repository MingyiSecLab/Mingyi-Atlas (11 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 1,870 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to flash-loan, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.