Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace --skill qa-initgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/qa-init)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/qa-init"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/qa-init/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/qa-init"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/qa-init.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.01305 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00522 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00261 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00130 |
Grade A, and why
qa-init scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Initialize PWDEV QA context
Observe the selected project, preserve its contracts and approvals, and create only missing QA context inside the project root. This workflow inventories capabilities; it does not execute tests. Read workflow, safety, artifacts, and tooling first.
Inputs
- The explicit project root, target, objective, and identified contract.
- The complete supplied criterion catalog with its original IDs and exact text, or an explicit statement that it is missing.
- Existing
.planning/pwdev-qa/context.md, project stack, test configuration, CI information, environments, devices, browsers, data restrictions, budget, and authorization boundaries. - A requested probe inventory. Each probe records
state(positive,negative, ornot_run), the exact check, its result, and observed evidence.
Procedure
- Resolve and identify the project root. Confine every inspection and context write within that project root; do not scan parent directories, user configuration, secrets, or personal browser state.
- Inspect
.planning/pwdev-qa/context.mdwithout following symlinks. Refuse a symlink or a non-regular existing path. Preserve and never overwrite an existing context file. If it is absent, create its parent directories and the context file only inside the project, using an exclusive create so a concurrent or newly appearing file is preserved. - Preserve the explicit objective and authorization boundaries exactly. Record only observed project facts: target, contract identity, criterion IDs and text, surfaces, stack, existing test entry points, CI, environments, data restrictions, approvals, and unknowns. Do not infer approval, a complete catalog, or an installed tool.
- Run only safe, read-only probes that the user or project context permits. Record a skipped
probe as
not_run. A probe result is observation, not authorization to run tests or contact an external service. - Consult
qa-toolingwith the observed stack, surface, runtime/OS, CI, budget, restrictions, authorization, and the exact probe inventory. Preserve probe statespositive,negative, andnot_runand its table without reclassifying absent probes. - Classify tools exactly as
available,missing, orunverified: only an explicit negative tool probe meansmissing; an absent/not-run probe or unmet prerequisite meansunverified. Never install, configure, or claim execution of a tool. - Apply the shared verdict rules to the current QA state. Missing criteria, unsafe evidence, or
pending required capability is
BLOCKED; a proven current in-scope failure isFAILand prevails. Initialization alone never supplies aPASSresult.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 106 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 3956c988ff90
qa-init is a skill published in the GitHub repository pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace (3 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 1,305 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-16.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
cua-driver
Use Cua Driver for desktop or browser tasks that are awkward or unavailable through Bash/APIs, or when the user explicitly wants GUI interaction: app testing, visual bug reproduction, form filling, calendar entry, screenshots, and demo recording. Also covers Cua setup; not OpenAI Codex Computer Use or web research.
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.