Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add qhuang20/shazam --skill scaffold-exercisesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qhuang20/shazamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/qhuang20/shazam/scaffold-exercises)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qhuang20/shazam/scaffold-exercises"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qhuang20/shazam/scaffold-exercises/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qhuang20/shazam/scaffold-exercises"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qhuang20/shazam/scaffold-exercises.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.00967 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00483 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00193 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
scaffold-exercises scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 111 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A e42d8b29da52
scaffold-exercises is a skill published in the GitHub repository qhuang20/shazam (4 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 967 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
complete
A skill for completing university assignments that contain several kinds of work, such as a report and a program. It divides the requirements between the appropriate skills and checks that the finished pieces agree with each other.
report
A writing skill for reports, essays, and answers to university assignment questions. It uses the assignment instructions and grading criteria to guide the document, then checks its structure, sources, facts, and required content.
math-olympiad
Solve competition math problems (IMO, Putnam, USAMO, AIME) with adversarial verification that catches the errors self-verification misses. Activates when asked to 'solve this IMO problem', 'prove this olympiad inequality', 'verify this competition proof', 'find a counterexample', 'is this proof correct', or for any…
practice-cognition
A method for testing ideas in practice, learning from the results, and improving the next attempt through repeated cycles.
36-anthropic-agents-kit-development
Create your Claude Agent SDK skill in one prompt, then learn to improve it throughout the chapter.
literature-review
Systematic literature review workflow: scope, search (arXiv, Semantic Scholar, Google Scholar), screen, extract, synthesize, and identify gaps. Triggers on: "literature review", "survey the literature", "related work", "systematic review", "synthesize the research", "find papers about", "research gap analysis".