Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tomoking2004/claude-plugins --skill reportgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tomoking2004/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomoking2004/claude-plugins/report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomoking2004/claude-plugins/report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomoking2004/claude-plugins/report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomoking2004/claude-plugins/report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomoking2004/claude-plugins/report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00095 | $0.00804 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.00322 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00161 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
対象：課題のうち文書で応える部分（レポート・小論文・設問回答等）．
手順
- 受領：RUBRIC.md を読み，その進行（受領・納品・修正）に従う——本スキルは執筆の段を担う．ブロッキング項目が残る間は着手しない．
- 執筆：出題文・採点基準を目的として，下の「領域の正典」に従って書く．
- 仕上げ：/refine:docs を発動し，美の6条で確定版へ仕上げる——美の基準（BEAUTY.md）は refine プラグインの正典であり，本スキルはそれを二重定義しない．委譲の際は，必要十分の基準となる目的が出題文・採点基準であることを明示する（成果物の文脈から推測させない）．/refine:docs が見えなければ，導入（
/plugin install refine@tomoking2004）を促す． - 走査：下の「固有の走査」と RUBRIC.md の遵守ゲートを全件通し，ゼロを確認して確定する．納品するかは同書の進行に従う——単独で呼ばれたなら本スキルが納品し，委譲されたなら束ねて出すのは委譲元の責務なので納品しない．
領域の正典
構成は序論・本論（設問ごとの節）・結論を基本とし，出題文に構成の指定があればそちらを優先する．引用形式は指定があればそれに従い，無ければ分野の慣習または既存レポートの多数派に合わせる．文体（である調／ですます調，日本語／英語）は出題文の指定，無ければ既存レポートの多数派に合わせる．
固有の走査
- 要求対応表：自分に割り当てられた要求項目（単独で呼ばれたなら出題文・採点基準の全項目）とレポート内の節を一対一で対応させ，抜けを潰す．
- 引用整合：本文中の引用箇所と参考文献リストの記載が一致する．
- 事実照合：本文が語る数値・図表・引用結果が，コードの実行結果や配布資料と一致する．
制約
出典・数値の捏造はしない．分量・書式・締切など判断の割れる箇所は推測せず問う．
失敗時
/heal:skill を呼ぶ．
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 32 lines · 95 tokens per session scan A c60db7403426
report is a skill published in the GitHub repository tomoking2004/claude-plugins (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 95 tokens to every session and 804 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
quiz-me
Post-work comprehension check: a self-contained HTML report of a completed change (context, intuition, decisions) with a quiz at the bottom that tests the human, not the artifact; also recalls prior quizzed work. Non-gating by default; the quizpolicy userConfig tunes offer cadence. Use when the user says 'quiz me'…
illustrate
Visual explainer for a concept or codebase topic, one idea per diagram, grounded in the real artifact and written as a markdown record plus an interactive page (markdown only on request). Presets: newcomer (default) and zero-knowledge (ELI5). Options: an STE register, and a video view too when explainer-video is…
eli5
Dead-simple VISUAL explainer. Produces a visual HTML explainer that assumes zero prior knowledge: one idea per diagram, minimal text. Works on a codebase object (a module, a tradeoff, an incident) or a general concept, and grounds in the real artifact before drawing anything. Use when: 'ELI5', 'explain like I'm five'…
grounding
Ground an approach in how a Dometrain course teaches it, via the Dometrain MCP server, and cite lessons with timestamped deep links. Use when: 'implementing', 'designing', 'reviewing', or 'debugging' anything covered by a Dometrain course: C#/.NET, ASP.NET Core, EF Core, testing, design patterns, architecture…
solve-constraint-puzzle
For constraint satisfaction: Sudoku, scheduling, N-queens, logic puzzles, SAT-like problems, assignment problems. Uses propagate-then-search pattern.
count-combinations
For probability and counting: permutations, combinations, sample spaces, Monte Carlo simulation, brute-force enumeration, card/dice problems.