Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/qte77/claude-code-plugins/implementing-firmwarenpx skills add qte77/claude-code-plugins --skill implementing-firmwaregit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qte77/claude-code-pluginsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00045 | $0.00633 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00316 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00127 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
implementing-firmware scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Firmware Implementation
Target: $ARGUMENTS
Implement firmware code with mandatory requirement traceability tags, following ESP-IDF or PlatformIO patterns.
References (MUST READ)
Read these before proceeding:
references/esp-idf-patterns.md— Component structure, FreeRTOS, sdkconfig, idf.pyreferences/platformio-patterns.md— platformio.ini, pio commands, library managementreferences/c-safety-rules.md— MISRA-C cppcheck flags, clang-tidy, tagging rules
Workflow
-
Detect framework:
CMakeLists.txt+sdkconfig*→ ESP-IDFplatformio.ini→ PlatformIO- Neither → ask user which framework to use
-
Read existing requirements — Check for
docs/requirements.mdto understand which SW-REQs need implementing -
Implement code with mandatory docstrings on every new function:
/** * @brief <What this function does> * * @requirement SW-REQ-NNN * @parent PRD-REQ-NNN * @test TEST-NNN * * @param ... * @return ... */ -
Create test stubs in
test/with matching@test TEST-NNNreferences -
Lint with cppcheck:
cppcheck --addon=misra.py --std=c11 --enable=all --xml src/ 2> misra-report.xml -
Build:
- ESP-IDF:
idf.py build - PlatformIO:
pio run
- ESP-IDF:
-
Report — Count tagged functions, list any warnings
Rules
- Every new function must have
@requirement,@parent, and@testtags - Follow existing code style (indentation, naming conventions) in the project
- Use ESP-IDF error handling patterns (
ESP_ERROR_CHECK,esp_err_treturns) - Do not suppress MISRA warnings without documenting the deviation
- Create header declarations alongside implementations
- Test stubs must compile even if test logic is not yet implemented
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 69 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A ce802eb43bd9
implementing-firmware is a skill published in the GitHub repository qte77/claude-code-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 633 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
orchestrator
FULLY AUTONOMOUS Flutter development pipeline orchestrator. Smart routing: PM analyzes -> creates targeted tasks -> Orchestrator executes only needed agents. Supports Asana task URLs. Includes QE verification via Maestro E2E tests. 7-phase flow: PM -> TodoWrite -> Execute -> Review -> Tests -> QE E2E -> Close.
flutter-guide
Flutter/BLoC Clean Architecture patterns, review checklists, and testing guides. Background knowledge for flutter-dev, flutter-reviewer, flutter-tester. Not user-invocable.
maestro-flutter
Maestro E2E testing knowledge for Flutter apps. YAML-based flows, TestKeys, visual regression, Maestro MCP integration. Background knowledge for QE E2E testing phase.
android-kotlin-compose
Android development with Kotlin and Jetpack Compose. Use when user mentions "Compose", "Jetpack Compose", "Material3", "Hilt", "Room", "ViewModel", or needs to build Android UI, implement MVVM architecture, manage Compose state, or integrate Jetpack libraries (Navigation, Room, Hilt, ViewModel). Triggers on…
android-kotlin-coroutines
Android development with Kotlin Coroutines and Flow. Use when user mentions "coroutines", "suspend", "Flow", "StateFlow", "SharedFlow", "viewModelScope", "lifecycleScope", or needs to implement async programming, handle structured concurrency, integrate coroutines with Retrofit/Room/WorkManager, or write coroutine…
codex-advisor
Advisory consultation skill for architectural reviews, design decisions, code analysis, and technology evaluation. Codex provides recommendations without making code changes. Invoked by phrases like "consult Codex", "get Codex's opinion", "ask Codex about", "have Codex review", "Codex analysis", "validate this…