Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Quality-Max/free-qa-skills --skill license-compliance-scangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Quality-Max/free-qa-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/quality-max/free-qa-skills/license-compliance-scan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/quality-max/free-qa-skills/license-compliance-scan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/quality-max/free-qa-skills/license-compliance-scan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/quality-max/free-qa-skills/license-compliance-scan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/quality-max/free-qa-skills/license-compliance-scan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00545 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00272 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00109 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
license-compliance-scan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 60 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
License Compliance Scan
Spot license conflicts in your dependency tree before they become a problem. Read-only and advisory — it flags risks, it doesn't change anything, and it is not legal advice.
Prerequisites
- None. Pure Claude Code — reads dependency manifests and your
LICENSEdirectly, no MCP required.
Trigger
- "Check my dependency licenses"
- "Any license conflicts in this project?"
- "License compliance scan"
Workflow
- Identify the project's own license (from
LICENSE/package.json/pyproject.toml, etc.). - Read dependency manifests present:
package.json,requirements.txt/pyproject.toml,go.mod,Cargo.toml,Gemfile,pom.xml, etc. List declared dependencies and, where stated, their licenses. - Compare each dependency's license against the project's and report
file:line(the manifest entry), severity, and the obligation.
What to flag
| Finding | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Strong copyleft in a permissive project | GPL/AGPL deps in an MIT/Apache project can impose source-disclosure obligations |
| Network copyleft (AGPL) | Obligations can trigger even for hosted/SaaS use |
| Unknown / missing license | A dependency with no clear license is a legal risk by default |
| License changed across versions | A pinned upgrade may pull in new obligations |
| Project itself missing a LICENSE | Others can't legally reuse it; flag if absent |
| Incompatible combinations | Two dependency licenses that can't be combined for distribution |
- Output an advisory report:
## License Compliance Scan
Project license: Apache-2.0
**1 high, 1 unknown**
### HIGH
- package.json:21 — "some-gpl-lib" is GPL-3.0; combining it with an Apache-2.0
distribution may impose source-disclosure obligations. Review or replace.
### UNKNOWN
- requirements.txt:8 — "obscure-pkg" declares no license. Treat as all-rights-
reserved until clarified.
Note: advisory only, not legal advice — confirm obligations with counsel.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 60 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A e8a6154ce8b4
license-compliance-scan is a skill published in the GitHub repository Quality-Max/free-qa-skills (10 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 545 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
regulatory-compliance-oimiragieo
Validate systems and processes against GDPR/CCPA privacy regulations, privacy-by-design principles, ADA/WCAG accessibility standards, data processing agreements (DPAs), and provide compliance checklists with regulatory change monitoring guidance.
contrast-checker
Color contrast analyzer for WCAG compliance. Use when analyzing color contrast in code files, when user mentions WCAG compliance, color accessibility, contrast ratios, or when discussing colors in UI components. Calculates contrast ratios, identifies violations, and suggests accessible color alternatives that preserve…
accessibility
Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.2 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible".
performance
Optimize web performance for faster loading and better user experience. Use when asked to "speed up my site", "optimize performance", "reduce load time", "fix slow loading", "improve page speed", or "performance audit".
seo
Optimize for search engine visibility and ranking. Use when asked to "improve SEO", "optimize for search", "fix meta tags", "add structured data", "sitemap optimization", or "search engine optimization".
best-practices
Apply modern web development best practices for security, compatibility, and code quality. Use when asked to "apply best practices", "security audit", "modernize code", "code quality review", or "check for vulnerabilities".