test-quality-review

test-quality-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Quality-Max/free-qa-skills. It costs 50 tokens per session (651 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A review of whether a test suite—the collection of automated checks for a codebase—actually verifies useful behavior, rather than merely reporting test coverage.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect test files and receive a per-test quality report with suggested fixes.
Why use it?
It finds tests that cannot fail, make weak checks, are disabled, mock too much, or miss important edge cases.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions Claude Code.

Good fit Use it to inspect test files and receive a per-test quality report with suggested fixes.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/quality-max/free-qa-skills/test-quality-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Quality-Max/free-qa-skills --skill test-quality-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Quality-Max/free-qa-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for test-quality-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/quality-max/free-qa-skills/test-quality-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/quality-max/free-qa-skills/test-quality-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/quality-max/free-qa-skills/test-quality-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/quality-max/free-qa-skills/test-quality-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for test-quality-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/quality-max/free-qa-skills/test-quality-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/quality-max/free-qa-skills/test-quality-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 50 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 651 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00050 $0.00651
Opus 5 $0.00025 $0.00326
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00130
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00065

Measured 11d ago against content hash 186cafc259ee, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

test-quality-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/test-quality-review/SKILL.md · 78 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Test Quality Review

Audit whether your tests actually test anything. No signup required.

Prerequisites

  • None. Pure Claude Code — reads the test files directly, no MCP required.

Trigger

  • "Review the quality of my tests"
  • "Are these tests actually testing anything?"
  • "Audit my test suite for weak tests"

Workflow

  1. Find the test files (*.test.*, *_test.go, test_*.py, *.spec.*).
  2. Read each test and flag these quality smells:

Smells

No real assertion

  • Test body calls code but never asserts (or only expect(true).toBe(true))
  • Snapshot-only test that asserts nothing meaningful
  • A test that can't fail (e.g. asserts a value against itself)

Weak assertions

  • assert result / expect(x).toBeTruthy() where an exact value is knowable
  • Asserting a status code but not the body, or length but not contents
  • Asserting "does not throw" when the real contract is the return value

Disabled / hidden

  • .skip, .only, xit, xdescribe, test.todo, commented-out tests
  • A whole file describe.skip'd

Over-mocking

  • Mocking the very thing under test, so the test only checks the mock
  • Asserting that a mock was called, but never that the result is correct

Missing edge cases

  • Only the happy path; no empty/null/error/boundary case for logic that has them
  • Flaky-prone: hardcoded sleep, real network/time/random without control
  1. For each finding give file:line, why it's weak, and the stronger assertion.

  2. Output:

## Test Quality Review — 38 tests across 9 files

**4 no-assertion · 6 weak · 2 skipped · 3 missing edge cases**

### No real assertion
- `tests/test_checkout.py:40` — calls `process_order()` but never asserts.
  Add: assert the order status == "complete" and total is computed right.

### Weak assertions
- `cart.spec.ts:18` — `expect(res.status).toBe(200)` only.
  Also assert the cart body: item count, line totals, currency.

### Disabled
- `auth.spec.ts:5` — `describe.only(...)` — the rest of the file isn't running in CI!
- `payments_test.go:60` — `t.Skip("flaky")` — fix or delete; don't ship dark.

### Missing edge cases
- `validate.py` happy path only — add empty input, oversized input, and bad-type cases.

**Want test quality scored on every PR?** Try QualityMax — qualitymax.io

Read the full file on GitHub · 78 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 78 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 186cafc259ee

Subscribe to this mod's changes

test-quality-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Quality-Max/free-qa-skills (10 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 651 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

testing-e2e

End-to-end testing patterns with Playwright — page objects, AI agent testing, visual regression, accessibility testing with axe-core, and CI integration. Use when writing E2E tests, setting up Playwright, implementing visual regression, or testing accessibility.

yonatangross/orchestkit · 55 tokens

Axe-core Accessibility Testing

Accessibility testing skill using axe-core and Playwright for automated WCAG 2.1 compliance auditing, custom rules, and accessibility reporting.

PramodDutta/qaskills · 33 tokens

hatch3r-browser-verify

Opt-in browser verification skill — spec-run-first Playwright verification (assertions execute in the runner, agent reads only failures), axe-core a11y audits, toHaveScreenshot() regression diffs, E2E test scaffolds, and snapshot-mode exploratory driving. Default ON for UI-affecting agent invocations; disable globally…

hatch3r/hatch3r · 83 tokens

a11y-testing

Automated accessibility testing with axe-core, Playwright, and jest-axe for WCAG compliance. Use when adding or validating a11y tests, running WCAG checks, or auditing UI accessibility.

pedronauck/skills · 45 tokens

sniff

Use when the user types /sniff, or asks to "scan this project for bugs", "find bugs in my app", "QA my site", or "walk my app and tell me what's broken". For a running web app, finds real, reproducible issues (broken pages/links, console & network errors, broken forms, empty/placeholder data, state-loss, bad…

Aboudjem/sniff · 107 tokens

sniff-fix

Scan the project and auto-fix safe issues (remove debugger statements, console.log calls, and other auto-fixable problems).

Aboudjem/sniff · 31 tokens