quality-screener-mcp-server: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/code-review-security/SKILL.md

code-review-security is a skill for Claude Code from quality-screener/quality-screener-mcp-server. It costs 102 tokens per session (3,677 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of code-review-security, MIT.

A security-focused code-review checklist and scanning guide for finding common weaknesses in software.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review pull requests, authentication and authorization code, APIs, file uploads, external data, and OWASP Top 10 risks.
Why use it?
It helps reviewers spot problems such as unauthorized access, unsafe input handling, exposed secrets, and vulnerable dependencies before changes are merged.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

This is quality-screener/quality-screener-mcp-server's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on quality-screener-mcp-server itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything quality-screener-mcp-server configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to quality-screener/quality-screener-mcp-server. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/quality-screener/quality-screener-mcp-server/main/.claude/skills/code-review-security/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/quality-screener/quality-screener-mcp-server

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-review-security

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/quality-screener/quality-screener-mcp-server/code-review-security/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/quality-screener/quality-screener-mcp-server/code-review-security)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/quality-screener/quality-screener-mcp-server/code-review-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/quality-screener/quality-screener-mcp-server/code-review-security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-review-security

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/quality-screener/quality-screener-mcp-server/code-review-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/quality-screener/quality-screener-mcp-server/code-review-security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 102 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,677 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00102 $0.03677
Opus 5 $0.00051 $0.01839
Sonnet 5 $0.00020 $0.00735
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00368

Measured 10d ago against content hash 6a7d57ae5b2f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review-security scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (scripts/security-scan.py), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Runs shell commandslowCapability

Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.

subprocess.run(f"convert {filename}", shell=True)
Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to code-review-security — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.claude/skills/code-review-security/SKILL.md · 486 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 486 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Review Security

When to Use

Activate this skill when:

  • Reviewing pull requests for security vulnerabilities
  • Auditing authentication or authorization code changes
  • Reviewing code that handles user input, file uploads, or external data
  • Checking for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities in new features
  • Validating that secrets are not committed to the repository
  • Scanning dependencies for known vulnerabilities
  • Reviewing API endpoints that expose sensitive data

Output: Write findings to security-review.md with severity, file:line, description, and recommendations.

Do NOT use this skill for:

  • Deployment infrastructure security (use docker-best-practices)
  • Incident response procedures (use incident-response)
  • General code quality review without security focus (use pre-merge-checklist)
  • Writing implementation code (use python-backend-expert or react-frontend-expert)

Instructions

OWASP Top 10 Checklist

Review every PR against the OWASP Top 10 (2021 edition). Each category below includes specific checks for Python/FastAPI and React codebases.


A01: Broken Access Control

What to look for:

  • Missing authorization checks on endpoints
  • Direct object reference without ownership verification
  • Endpoints that expose data without role-based filtering
  • Missing Depends() for auth on new routes

Python/FastAPI checks:

# BAD: No authorization check -- any authenticated user can access any user
@router.get("/users/{user_id}")
async def get_user(user_id: int, db: Session = Depends(get_db)):
    return await user_repo.get(user_id)

# GOOD: Verify the requesting user owns the resource or is admin
@router.get("/users/{user_id}")
async def get_user(
    user_id: int,
    current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user),
    db: Session = Depends(get_db),
):
    if current_user.id != user_id and current_user.role != "admin":
        raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail="Forbidden")
    return await user_repo.get(user_id)

Read the full file on GitHub · 486 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 486 lines · 102 tokens per session scan A 6a7d57ae5b2f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review-security is a skill published in the GitHub repository quality-screener/quality-screener-mcp-server (0 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 102 tokens to every session and 3,677 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). It is 100% identical to code-review-security, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.