Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add QuantumByteOSS/quantumbyte --skill qualificationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/QuantumByteOSS/quantumbyteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/quantumbyteoss/quantumbyte/qualification)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/quantumbyteoss/quantumbyte/qualification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/quantumbyteoss/quantumbyte/qualification/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/quantumbyteoss/quantumbyte/qualification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/quantumbyteoss/quantumbyte/qualification.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.00579 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00232 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00116 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
qualification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 43 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Qualification
A parallel read, not a gate the user sees. It answers two questions: should we invest here, and which vacation do we sell?
Signals (from input + passive context)
- real_business — a concrete operation, not a vague idea.
- stakes — money, time, or reputation on the line.
- agency — can this person actually decide / act?
- engagement — specifics vs hand-waving.
- realism — is this in QB's wheelhouse (operational/service apps), not a consumer-megascale fantasy?
Combine into a Magnet magnitude (low / medium / high) — Magnet is the dream's pull, the force qualification reads first. High Magnet → effort_mode: double_down. Low → light touch or route to disqualification. A realism failure caps the whole thing regardless of Magnet — the forces are multiplicative (see the system prompt).
Archetype (drives which vacation, and how the bears behave)
| Archetype | Tell | Vacation to sell | Bear posture |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solo founder | own checkbook, runs the thing | reclaim time / stop the bleed | practical, plainspoken |
| Champion | in-org advocate, needs sign-off | look good to leadership; load their pitch | ROI-framed; draft the internal case |
| Hobbyist | no commercial pressure | the joy of the thing shipped | peer-to-peer, honest about scope |
| Economic buyer | signs the check directly | risk-down, clear ROI | crisp, numbers-first |
Default to neutral if the archetype flag is absent — never force a label on thin evidence.
Routing
- magnitude ≥ minimum → proceed; pass archetype + effort_mode to the spine so the convince ladder is tuned.
- magnitude sustained-low OR realism failure → hand to disqualification.
The cost of skipping qualification
If the user skips ahead (or the opening loop didn't gather enough), proceed at neutral effort — but know the convince ladder and the generated app will be generic. That's the visible cost of a thin read; it's acceptable, not ideal.
Dependencies (fall back if absent)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 43 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A c090cc2b8bbd
qualification is a skill published in the GitHub repository QuantumByteOSS/quantumbyte (305 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 579 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
factory-rereview
Re-review a pull request after a push — reconcile the previous review against the new commits, look for new defects the push introduced, then a fresh pass over the whole PR, and finish with a verdict on the PR.
understand-pr
Review a PR the way a seasoned maintainer would — build an independent model before seeing the diff, investigate the implementation and history, verify material claims, and return a concise briefing. Use for any PR review, self-review, or re-review.
factory-triage
Triage a Factory work item's issue — trace history, understand architecture, diagnose root cause, then advance the stage.
codemod-patterns
This guide helps AI agents efficiently create codemods with optimal performance and consistency.
factory-gitlab-review
Review a GitLab merge request for a Factory work item using brokered source-control tools.
herdr-kit-workflows
Set up and operate Herdr Kit safely: install and configure the plugin and Mastra Code integration, manage Review and Work repository scope, open primary repository workspaces, synchronize managers, materialize or dematerialize managed worktrees, and update Herdr Kit settings or shortcuts.