Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add queelius/claude-anvil/plugin install pub-pipelineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/queelius/claude-anvil/joss-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/queelius/claude-anvil/joss-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/queelius/claude-anvil/joss-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/queelius/claude-anvil/joss-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/queelius/claude-anvil/joss-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.01960 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00784 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00392 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00196 |
Grade A, and why
joss-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 202 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
JOSS Submission Audit
Evaluate an R package against the complete JOSS reviewer checklist and produce a structured gap report. This covers software quality, documentation, development history, and paper.md format compliance.
Workflow
1. Locate the Package and Paper
Identify the R package root (look for DESCRIPTION). Then search for paper.md — check root, paper/, joss/, and inst/paper/. If no paper.md exists, note this as a critical gap.
1b. Load User Config
Read .claude/pub-pipeline.local.md if it exists (Read tool). Extract author metadata (ORCID, affiliation) and package context from YAML frontmatter. If the file is missing, inform the user and offer to create one from the template at ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/docs/user-config-template.md.
2. Check Software Requirements
License (Read tool):
- Verify a plain-text
LICENSEorLICENSE.mdfile exists - Confirm it's an OSI-approved license (MIT, GPL-2, GPL-3, Apache-2.0, BSD, etc.)
Repository quality (Bash tool):
# Development history: 6+ months of commits
git log --oneline --since="6 months ago" | wc -l
# Multiple contributors
git shortlog -sn --all | head -10
# Issues/PRs activity
gh issue list --state all --limit 5
gh pr list --state all --limit 5
# Tags/releases
git tag -l | tail -5
Documentation (Glob/Read tools):
README.mdexists with installation instructions- Usage examples present (in README, vignettes, or both)
- API documentation exists (
man/directory with.Rdfiles) - Contributing guidelines (
CONTRIBUTING.mdor in README) - Issue reporting instructions
Testing (Bash/Glob tools):
- Test directory exists (
tests/testthat/ortests/) - Tests actually run:
Rscript -e 'devtools::test()' - Coverage check:
Rscript -e 'covr::package_coverage()'
Installation (Bash tool):
- Verify package installs cleanly:
Rscript -e 'devtools::install()'
3. Check Paper Format
If paper.md exists, validate against JOSS format requirements.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 202 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 1a3f9e042463
joss-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository queelius/claude-anvil (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 1,960 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-19.
Other skills, from other repositories
alive:demo
Generate a believable, lived-in ALIVE world from a free-text persona description (custom path) or a deterministic sandbox preset. Routes the create/list/activate/deactivate/delete/status surface and orchestrates the 5-stage subagent generation pipeline.
karpenter
Design, install, debug, review, plan capacity, audit scaling history, migrate from Cluster Autoscaler, and upgrade Karpenter v1.x on EKS. Covers NodePool, EC2NodeClass, NodeClaim, Spot diversity, disruption strategy, Pod Identity/IRSA, interruption queue, private clusters, AMI rotation, and GitOps integration. Use…
pr-review
Comprehensive PR review across six dimensions — cost impact, environment drift, ownership gaps, SOC 2 compliance, deprecated API / version hygiene, and rollback feasibility. Each mode inspects the diff and current file state, reports findings with severity, and recommends concrete fixes. Use when preparing a PR for…
alive:system-upgrade
Upgrade ALIVE to the current version. Handles v1/v2/v3.x source states, multi-surface aware (alive-mcp / Hermes / Codex), retroactive version detection, partial-failure resume, dry-run previews, and rollback inspection.
azure
Azure identity (Workload Identity, OIDC, Entra ID), resource tagging, AKS platform patterns, RBAC scoping, and production-readiness review — with Terraform generation.
kubescape
Check Kubernetes manifests, Helm charts, Kustomize overlays and live clusters against NSA-CISA, MITRE ATT&CK, CIS (EKS, AKS, GKE, vanilla) and SOC2 with the Kubescape CLI. Covers framework choice, score and severity gates, PR gates that fail only on new findings (--baseline), exceptions that actually suppress…